Acute Resource Divergence
Acute Resource Divergence
Acute Resource Divergence Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Priority Review
Trajectory Thumbprint

Acute Resource Divergence

What does this mean?

Revenue is contracting significantly, but executive compensation percentage is rising. The organization is refusing to adjust its administrative overhead to match its new economic reality.

The Path Forward

The Realignment

Forces immediate balancing of administrative bloat against actual programmatic output. It demands that every dollar extracted for overhead be justified by community impact.

The Realignment
The Realignment
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Acute Resource Divergence ↓
Overall
22
Score
Governance
42
Score
Financial
0
Score
Program
45
Score

Institutional Epochs

2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Resource Divergence

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2024 Hidden Hidden — — Unknown —
2023 Hidden Hidden 35.1% 22 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2022 — — 34.2% 22 Critical Intervention Needed Gov Risk
2021 — — 18.2% 35 Financially Distressed Stable Watch
2020 — — 16.7% 35 Financially Distressed Recovery
2019 — — 18.5% 25 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2018 — — 15.1% 31 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch
2017 — — 10.7% 33 Critical Intervention Needed Recovery
2016 — — 18.1% 29 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch
2015 — — — 27 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch
2014 — — — 27 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2013 — — — 35 Financially Distressed Decline Risk
2012 — — — 43 Financially Distressed Decline Risk
2011 — — — 47 Fragile Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2025

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
MARIDEE SLATER Artistic Director 17.5% of Rev
LELA OLSON Board Member 17.5% of Rev
JEFFREY PROTTAS Board President —
ELI ARONSON Treasurer —
LINH GILLES Board Member —
JANESSA PRAWER Board Member —
ALLI ST JOHN Board Member —
ANN JOHNSON STEWART Board Member —

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Charlie Leanard Artistic Director 15.8% of Rev
Dana Carlson Board President —
Drew Page Board President —
Dave Hoover Treasurer —
Armando Mojica Secretary —
Jen Biggs Board Member —
Jolene Noelle Board Member —

Tax year 2022

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Charlie Leanard Artistic Director 15.8% of Rev
Dana Carlson Board President —
Jen Biggs Board President —
Dave Hoover Treasurer —
Robyn Ruark Secretary —
Jodi Danovsky Board Member —
Norah Bluvshtein Board Member —
Brennen Ohlemann Board Member —
Drew Page Board Member —
Rebecca Skelton Board Member —
Liz Ward Board Member —

Tax year 2021

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Charlie Leanard Artistic Director 18.5% of Rev
Dana Carlson Board President —
Jen Biggs Board President —
Dave Hoover Treasurer —
Robyn Ruark Secretary —
Jodi Danovsky Board Member —
Norah Olson Bluvshtein Board Member —
Katie Sale Board Member —
Elizabeth Ward Board Member —
Rebecca Skelton Board Member —
Wendy Olson Board Member —
Ami Tix Board Member —
Brennen Ohlemann Board Member —
Drew Page Board Member —
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
0 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
42 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
45 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
22 / 100
Priority Review

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 256 other orgs in MN with NTEE prefix A6.

Most-divergent component: financial score sits 51 points below the peer median (0 vs. 51).

5-year trend: Acute Resource Divergence

Revenue is contracting significantly, but executive compensation percentage is rising. The organization is refusing to adjust its administrative overhead to match its new economic reality.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

The two changes that would most improve this score:

  1. Reduce top-officer compensation from 35.1% to under 22% of revenue — would move governance score by ~26 points.
  2. Separate signing authority from fundraising authority when both are held by one person — removes the concentration penalty (~12 points).

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.