Steady State
Steady State
Steady State Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Priority Review
Trajectory Thumbprint

Steady State

What does this mean?

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

The Path Forward

The Stewardship

Focuses on long-term sustainability and gentle cultivation of existing resources rather than forced expansion. It honors the organization's established role as a reliable anchor.

The Stewardship
The Stewardship
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Steady State
Overall
35
Score
Governance
50
Score
Financial
15
Score
Program
45
Score

Institutional Epochs

2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Steady State

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2024 Hidden Hidden Unknown
2023 35 Critical Intervention Needed Recovery
2022 15.5% 31 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2021 14.8% 46 Fragile Decline Risk
2020 11.8% 50 Fragile Recovery
2019 51 Fragile Recovery
2018 49 Fragile Gov Risk
2017 49 Fragile Recovery
2016 47 Fragile Recovery
2015 13.4% 31 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2014 12.6% 38 Financially Distressed Decline Risk
2013 19.5% 34 Critical Intervention Needed Gov Risk
2012 10.9% 43 Fragile Recovery
2011 10.4% 33 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2025

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
JAMES PARKER EXECUTIVE DI 16.8% of Rev
RICH EGGETT Board Member
MICHAEL HOHL Board President
MACKENZIE PEDERSEN Board Member
BRINTON WILKINS Board Member

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
JAMES PARKER EXECUTIVE DI 17.7% of Rev
JAMES PARKER EXECUTIVE DI 17.7% of Rev
JOHN HOLGREN Board Member
ALISON JENSEN Board Member
JON LEA Board Member
EMILY PARKER Board Member
BRANDON PATTERSON Board Member
RICH EGGETT Board Member
MICHAEL HOHL Board President
MACKENZIE PEDERSEN Board Member
BRINTON WILKINS Board Member

Tax year 2021

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
JAMES PARKER EXECUTIVE DI 14.8% of Rev
EMILY PARKER Board Member 1.5% of Rev
JOHN HOLGREN Board Member
ALISON JENSEN Board Member
JON LEA Board Member
BRANDON PATTERSON Board Member
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
15 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
50 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
45 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
35 / 100
Priority Review

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 19 other orgs in UT with NTEE prefix A2.

Most-divergent component: program score sits 17 points above the peer median (45 vs. 28).

5-year trend: Steady State

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

The two changes that would most improve this score:

  1. Build cash reserves to at least 3 months of operating expenses — moves financial resilience score meaningfully (~10 points).

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.