Structural Deficit
Structural Deficit
Structural Deficit Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Priority Review
Trajectory Thumbprint

Structural Deficit

What does this mean?

Persistently low financial health over 5 years despite strong programmatic output. They are borrowing from their future (or bleeding an endowment) to pay for today's programs.

The Path Forward

The Truth-Teller

Forces necessary, painful cuts to preserve the core. It demands that the organization stop borrowing from its future and align its current programmatic output with actual sustainable revenue.

The Truth-Teller
The Truth-Teller
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Structural Deficit
Overall
31
Score
Governance
50
Score
Financial
0
Score
Program
60
Score

Institutional Epochs

2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Structural Deficit

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2024 Hidden Hidden 31 Critical Intervention Needed Recovery
2023 23.7% 29 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2022 29 Critical Intervention Needed Recovery
2021 31.2% 36 Fragile Recovery
2020 34 Critical Intervention Needed Recovery
2019 31.3% 30 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2018 31 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch
2017 34 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2016 38 Financially Distressed Stable Watch
2015 38 Financially Distressed Stable Watch
2014 35 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch
2013 35 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch
2012 35 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch
2011 35 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
BILL HARTUNG EXECUTIVE DI 21.3% of Rev
CINDY GRAY ASSOCIATE DI 10.3% of Rev
KATHERINE ARACRI Board Member
TOM BARNICK Board Member
LUISA BEIGI Board Member
BETHANY CASAGRANDA Board President
PRESTON CIRANNI Board Member
KRISTEN GALVIN Board Member
MICHELE HATHAWAY Board Member
MARCI HECKLER Board President
ROBERT MAX JUNKER Board Member
KEVIN MCQUILLAN Treasurer
CHANTELLE MOORE Board Member
TARA O'BRIEN Board Member
LISA POPCAK Board Member
ANDREW REINHART Board Member
LAURA SCHLECKER Secretary

Tax year 2022

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
JASON APPELT Board Member
KATHERINE ARACRI Board Member
TOM BARNICK Board Member
BETHANY CASAGRANDA Board Member
PRESTON CIRANNI Board Member
KRISTEN GALVIN Board Member
CINDY GRAY ASSOCIATE DI
MARCI HECKLER Board President
ROBERT MAX JUNKER Board Member
KEVIN MCQUILLAN Treasurer
CHANTELLE MOORE Board Member
TARA O'BRIEN Board Member
ANDREW REINHART Board Member
LAURA SCHLECKER Secretary
RICH SIEBER Board President
BILL HARTUNG EXECUTIVE DI

Tax year 2021

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
BILL HARTUNG EXECUTIVE DI 19.4% of Rev
CINDY GRAY ASSOCIATE DI 9.5% of Rev
RICH SIEBER Board President
JASON APPELT Board Member
KATHERINE ARACRI Board Member
TOM BARNICK Board Member
BETHANY CASAGRANDA Board Member
PRESTON CIRANNI Board Member
KRISTEN GALVIN Board Member
MARCI HECKLER Board President
ROBERT MAX JUNKER Board Member
KEVIN MCQUILLAN Treasurer
CHANTELLE MOORE Board Member
TARA O'BRIEN Board Member
ANDREW REINHART Board Member
LAURA SCHLECKER Secretary
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
0 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
50 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
60 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
31 / 100
Priority Review

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 295 other orgs in PA with NTEE prefix A6.

Most-divergent component: financial score sits 38 points below the peer median (0 vs. 38).

5-year trend: Structural Deficit

Persistently low financial health over 5 years despite strong programmatic output. They are borrowing from their future (or bleeding an endowment) to pay for today's programs.

Overall score has gone from 34 → 31 over 5 years (declining by 3 points).

What's driving this score

What would change this score

The two changes that would most improve this score:

  1. Build cash reserves to at least 3 months of operating expenses — moves financial resilience score meaningfully (~10 points).

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.