Structural Deficit
Structural Deficit
Structural Deficit Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Priority Review
Trajectory Thumbprint

Structural Deficit

What does this mean?

Persistently low financial health over 5 years despite strong programmatic output. They are borrowing from their future (or bleeding an endowment) to pay for today's programs.

The Path Forward

The Truth-Teller

Forces necessary, painful cuts to preserve the core. It demands that the organization stop borrowing from its future and align its current programmatic output with actual sustainable revenue.

The Truth-Teller
The Truth-Teller
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Structural Deficit ↑
Overall
38
Score
Governance
55
Score
Financial
10
Score
Program
60
Score

Institutional Epochs

2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Structural Deficit

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2024 Hidden Hidden — — Unknown —
2023 Hidden Hidden 6.8% 38 Financially Distressed Recovery
2022 — — 9.6% 34 Critical Intervention Needed Recovery
2021 — — — 42 Fragile Stable Watch
2020 — — 8.5% 40 Fragile Recovery
2019 — — 10.7% 29 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2018 — — 9.8% 38 Financially Distressed Recovery
2017 — — 10.4% 29 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2016 — — 12.1% 32 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2015 — — 8.0% 40 Financially Distressed Recovery
2014 — — 11.2% 27 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2013 — — 10.9% 33 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2012 — — 9.9% 40 Financially Distressed Recovery
2011 — — 9.2% 38 Financially Distressed Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2025

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Christine Brondyke Executive Director 7.8% of Rev
Gary Bates Board Member —
Karen Zyck Galbraith Board Member —
Chad Kanick Board Member —
Christopher Chan Treasurer —
Nancy Sansom Board Member —
Barbara Cooley Thaw Board Member —
Tracey Staley Board Member —
Sarah Aziz Board President —
Terri Tunick Board President —
Jen Young Board Member —
Janice Patz Board Member —
Bonita Penn Secretary —
Stephen Hunter Board Member —
Marcie Coates Board Member —
Shari Dearth Board Member —
Stacey Neilson Board Member —
Savannah Perez Board Member —

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Christine Brondyke Executive Director 5.0% of Rev
Gary Bates Board Member —
Pete Schlicht Treasurer —
Maggie Setler Board Member —
Christopher Chan Treasurer —
Yasmina Conti Board Member —
E Alyx Hamilton Board Member —
Nancy Sansom Board Member —
Zoe Stanley Board Member —
Barbara Thaw Secretary —
Sarah Aziz Board President —
Terri Tunick Board President —
George Sebolt Board Member —
Jen Young Board Member —
Elizabeth Murphy Board Member —
Janice Patz Board Member —
Bonita Penn Board Member —
Stephen Hunter Board Member —

Tax year 2021

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Thomas Walters Executive Director 3.8% of Rev
Gary Bates Board Member —
Pete Schlicht Treasurer —
Maggie Setler Board Member —
Barbara Cooley Thaw Secretary —
Elizabeth Shapiro Murphy Board Member —
Barbara Pontello Board President —
E Alyx Hamilton Board Member —
Safiya Boucaud-Robinson Board Member —
Nancy Sansom Board Member —
Zoe Stanley Board Member —
Diane Houser Board Member —
Sarah Aziz Board President —
Thressia Kriebel Board Member —
George Sebolt Board Member —
Christine Swann Board Member —
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
10 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
55 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
60 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
38 / 100
Priority Review

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 221 other orgs in PA with NTEE prefix A2.

Most-divergent component: financial score sits 62 points below the peer median (10 vs. 72).

5-year trend: Structural Deficit

Persistently low financial health over 5 years despite strong programmatic output. They are borrowing from their future (or bleeding an endowment) to pay for today's programs.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

The two changes that would most improve this score:

  1. Build cash reserves to at least 3 months of operating expenses — moves financial resilience score meaningfully (~10 points).

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.