Compensation Escalation Cycle
Compensation Escalation Cycle
Compensation Escalation Cycle Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Developing
Trajectory Thumbprint

Compensation Escalation Cycle

What does this mean?

Revenue grows modestly, but top officer compensation grows consistently for 5 years, breaching danger zones. The executive is negotiating aggressive raises against a compliant board.

The Path Forward

The Steward

Re-establishes board supremacy over executive extraction. It freezes compensation and mandates that all future financial rewards be tied strictly to verifiable mission expansion.

The Steward
The Steward
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Compensation Escalation Cycle ↑
Overall
53
Score
Governance
45
Score
Financial
60
Score
Program
60
Score

Institutional Epochs

2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Compensation Escalation

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2024 Hidden Hidden — — Unknown —
2023 — — 15.1% 53 Fragile Gov Risk
2022 — — 13.1% 56 Fragile Recovery
2021 — — 10.4% 52 Fragile Stable Watch
2020 — — 9.0% 54 Fragile Recovery
2019 — — 10.0% 56 Fragile Stable Watch
2018 — — 8.9% 56 Fragile Gov Risk
2017 — — 12.6% 56 Fragile Recovery
2016 — — 7.6% 54 Fragile Recovery
2015 — — — 52 Fragile Recovery
2014 — — — 48 Fragile Decline Risk
2013 — — — 52 Fragile Stable Watch
2012 — — — 52 Fragile Stable Watch
2011 — — — 52 Fragile Stable Watch
2010 — — — 52 Fragile Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2025

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
TIMOTHY HOLMES Executive Director 8.6% of Rev
CAROLINE MUNLEY Board President —
JOYCE LOMMA Board President —
THOMAS MILLARD Treasurer —
TIM TYLER Treasurer —
DEBORAH PANN Secretary —
ALEX MOLFETAS Board President —
MELANIE ANDREOLI-CARPENETTI Board Member —
MARK DESTEFANO Board Member —
DONALD J FREDERICKSON JR ESQ Board Member —
CATHERINE A GALLAGHER Board Member —
MAX PETERS Board Member —
CARL PETTINATO Board Member —
PATRICIA ROSETTI Board Member —
HEIDI SCHUKRAFT Board Member —
ROBERT SOLFANELLI Board Member —
BRENDAN WALKER Board Member —
JOEY ZARCONE Board Member —
LISA FAVINI BAILEY Board Member —

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
CHARLES BARBER Executive Director 4.1% of Rev
KATHY JOHNSON BOWLES Executive Director 3.9% of Rev
JOHN FARKAS PHD Board Member 1.6% of Rev
RODMAN AZAR Treasurer —
DONALD J FREDERICKSON JR ESQ Board Member —
AMANDA FRIEDER Board President —
CATHERINE A GALLAGHER Board Member —
EMILY KARAM Board Member —
VAL KISER Secretary —
JOYCE LOMMA Board President —
LINDA LYNETT Board Member —
CAROL CURTIS MCMULLEN Treasurer —
THOMAS MILLARD Board Member —
MIKE MULLER Board Member —
ALEX MOLFETAS Board Member —
CAROLINE MUNLEY Board President —
DEBORAH PANN Secretary —
HEIDI SCHUKRAFT Board Member —
ROBERT SOLFANELLI Board Member —
TIM TYLER Board Member —
AMY YANDO Board Member —
JOEY ZARCONE Board President —

Tax year 2021

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
AURORE GIGUET Executive Director 3.4% of Rev
DEBORAH L PANN Board Member 3.2% of Rev
KATIE GOLDOVICH Treasurer 0.8% of Rev
AMANDA FRIEDER Board President —
CATHERINE A GALLAGHER Board Member —
EMILY KARAM Board Member —
VALERIE KISER Board Member —
JOYCE J LOMMA Board Member —
LINDA LYNETT Secretary —
KEN M MARQUIS Board Member —
CAROL CURTIS MCMULLEN Treasurer —
THOMAS MILLARD Board Member —
MIKE MULLER Board Member —
ALEX MOLFETAS Board Member —
CAROLINE MUNLEY Board President —
JANE OPPENHEIM Board Member —
ROBERT SOLFANELLI Board Member —
AMY YANDO Board Member —
JOEY ZARCONE Board Member —
TARA ATKINS Board Member —
RODMAN AZAR Treasurer —
MARK H DESTEFANO Board Member —
DONALD J FREDERICKSON JR ESQ Board President —
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
60 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
45 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
60 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
53 / 100
Developing

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 133 other orgs in PA with NTEE prefix A5.

Most-divergent component: governance score sits 37 points below the peer median (45 vs. 82).

5-year trend: Compensation Escalation Cycle

Revenue grows modestly, but top officer compensation grows consistently for 5 years, breaching danger zones. The executive is negotiating aggressive raises against a compliant board.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

The two changes that would most improve this score:

  1. Separate signing authority from fundraising authority when both are held by one person — removes the concentration penalty (~12 points).

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.