Governance Lag
Governance Lag
Governance Lag Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Stable
Trajectory Thumbprint

Governance Lag

What does this mean?

Revenue and Program Scale spike rapidly, but the Governance Score remains stagnant. The organization has outgrown its founding era but hasn't installed proper oversight.

The Path Forward

The Scaffold

Brings immediate structural maturity. It represents the necessity of outside, independent oversight to manage new scale, breaking the echo chamber of a founding 'friends and family' board.

The Scaffold
The Scaffold
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Governance Lag ↑
Overall
48
Score
Governance
50
Score
Financial
50
Score
Program
30
Score

Institutional Epochs

2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Governance Lag

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2025 Hidden Hidden — — Unknown —
2024 — — — 48 Fragile Decline Risk
2023 — — — 45 Fragile Decline Risk
2022 — — — 26 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2021 — — — 50 Fragile Decline Risk
2020 — — — 44 Fragile Decline Risk
2019 — — — 48 Fragile Recovery
2018 — — — 41 Fragile Decline Risk
2017 — — — 45 Fragile Recovery
2016 — — — 39 Financially Distressed Recovery
2015 — — — 27 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch
2014 — — — 27 Critical Intervention Needed Recovery
2013 — — 32.0% 26 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2012 — — — 27 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2025

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
David Aschenbeck Board President —
Tranquil Bent Board Member —
Kelly Burns Board Member —
Ruth Campbell Secretary —
Karena Casey Board President —
Kiran Dahlin Board Member —
Brian Dole Board Member —
Kevin Duggins Treasurer —
Lois Ebnet Board Member —
Patti Flekke Board Member —
Kristin Jewell Board Member —
Piper Monforto Board Member —
Jacqueline Tinberg Board Member —

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Anneli Borst Board President —
Karena Casey Board President —
Ruth Campbell Secretary —
Kevin Duggins Treasurer —
David Aschenbeck Board Member —
Kiran Dahlin Board Member —
Brian Dole Board Member —
Lois Ebnet Board Member —
Cyndy Tholen Ingham Board Member —
Piper Monforto Board Member —
Brian Knapp Board President —
Anneli Borst Board President —
Ruth Campbell Secretary —
Kevin Duggins Treasurer —
Karena Casey Board Member —
Kiran Dahlin Board Member —
Lois Ebnet Board Member —
Cyndy Tholen Ingham Board Member —
Jaclyn Loushine Board Member —

Tax year 2022

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Brian Knapp Board President —
Scott Swanson Board Member —
Kelly Burns Secretary —
Kristen Jewell Treasurer —
Krista Biason Board Member —
Anneli Borst Board President —
Ruth Campbell Board Member —
Karena Casey Board Member —
Kiran Dahlin Board Member —
Cyndy Tholen Ingham Board Member —
Amy Kessler Board Member —
Jaclyn Loushine Board Member —

Tax year 2021

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Brian Knapp Board President —
Scott Swanson Board Member —
Kelly Burns Secretary —
Kristen Jewell Treasurer —
Krista Biason Board Member —
Anneli Borst Board President —
Barbara Bren Board Member —
Karena Casey Board Member —
Kiran Dahlin Board Member —
Cyndy Tholen Ingham Board Member —
Amy Kessler Board Member —
Jaclyn Loushine Board Member —
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
50 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
50 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
30 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
48 / 100
Stable

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 257 other orgs in MN with NTEE prefix A6.

Most-divergent component: governance score sits 11 points below the peer median (50 vs. 61).

5-year trend: Governance Lag

Revenue and Program Scale spike rapidly, but the Governance Score remains stagnant. The organization has outgrown its founding era but hasn't installed proper oversight.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

The two changes that would most improve this score:

  1. Stabilize program expenses or grow earned-income revenue to break the consecutive-deficit pattern (~8 points to financial score).

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.