Compensation Escalation Cycle
Compensation Escalation Cycle
Compensation Escalation Cycle Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Priority Review
Trajectory Thumbprint

Compensation Escalation Cycle

What does this mean?

Revenue grows modestly, but top officer compensation grows consistently for 5 years, breaching danger zones. The executive is negotiating aggressive raises against a compliant board.

The Path Forward

The Steward

Re-establishes board supremacy over executive extraction. It freezes compensation and mandates that all future financial rewards be tied strictly to verifiable mission expansion.

The Steward
The Steward
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Compensation Escalation Cycle
Overall
41
Score
Governance
45
Score
Financial
40
Score
Program
45
Score

Institutional Epochs

2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Compensation Escalation

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2024 Hidden Hidden Unknown
2023 17.3% 41 Fragile Gov Risk
2022 7.3% 52 Fragile Recovery
2021 20.5% 45 Governance-Stressed Recovery
2020 18.6% 31 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2019 8.4% 50 Fragile Recovery
2018 6.2% 44 Fragile Stable Watch
2017 8.8% 40 Fragile Recovery
2016 10.8% 30 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2015 9.7% 36 Financially Distressed Decline Risk
2014 9.3% 36 Financially Distressed Decline Risk
2013 7.7% 40 Fragile Recovery
2012 9.1% 36 Financially Distressed Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2025

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
BIANA KOVIC Executive Director 11.7% of Rev
KIMBERLY MELLER Executive Director 5.6% of Rev
KENT HOFFMANN Secretary
JOHN MCCLARY Board Member
ANNE SMITH Board President
CELESTE PAULI Board President
DAVID HEIN Board Member
DAMON WENIG Board Member
MICHAEL BROOKS Board Member
EVAN CHANCELLOR Board Member
STEVEN FISCHER Board Member
LAURA HERZOG Treasurer
TRICIA MARTON Board Member
PERRY PHILLIPS Board Member
JULIE SEBRANEK Board Member
DARREN OPEL Board Member

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
JOSHUA HERNDAY Board Member 15.9% of Rev
KEITH ABLER Board Member
KRISTINE BERGAMO Board Member
SCOTT KUEHN Board Member
GINA COVELLI Board Member
ROBERTA FILICKY-PENESKI Board Member
JEFF MOHR Board Member
KIMBERLYANNE MELLER Board Member
DAREN OPEL Board Member
ANN SMITH Board Member
DAVID HEIN Board Member
BILL JACOB Board Member
KATHIE NORMAN Board President
CELESTE PAULI Board President
JOHN MCLARY Treasurer
EMILY RENDALL-ARAUJO Secretary
DAMON WENIG Board Member

Tax year 2021

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
JOSHUA HERNDAY Board Member 15.6% of Rev
JOSHUA HERNDAY Board Member 13.0% of Rev
KEITH ABLER Board Member
KRISTEN BERGAMO Board Member
EUGENE CONGER Board Member
GINA COVELLI Board Member
ROBERTA FILICKY-PENESKI Board Member
DAVID GALLIANETTI Board Member
KIM MELLER Board Member
JEFF MOHR Board Member
DARREN OPEL Board Member
EMILY RENDALL - ARAUJO Board Member
ANNE SMITH Board Member
STEVE STAUBER Board Member
SCOTT KUEHN Board President
KATHIE NORMAN Board President
JOHN MCLARY Treasurer
CELESTE PAULI Secretary
KEITH ABLER Board Member
KRISTEN BERGAMO Board Member
EUGENE CONGER Board Member
GINA COVELLI Board Member
ROBERTA FILICKY-PENESKI Board Member
DAVID GALLIANETTI Board Member
KIM MELLER Board Member
JEFF MOHR Board Member
DARREN OPEL Board Member
EMILY RENDALL - ARAUJO Board Member
ANNE SMITH Board Member
SCOTT KUEHN Board President
KATHIE NORMAN Board President
JOHN MCLARY Treasurer
CELESTE PAULI Secretary
DAVID HEIN Board Member
BILL JACOB Board Member
DAMON WENIG Board Member
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
40 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
45 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
45 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
41 / 100
Priority Review

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 103 other orgs in WI with NTEE prefix A6.

Most-divergent component: program score sits 17 points above the peer median (45 vs. 28).

5-year trend: Compensation Escalation Cycle

Revenue grows modestly, but top officer compensation grows consistently for 5 years, breaching danger zones. The executive is negotiating aggressive raises against a compliant board.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

The two changes that would most improve this score:

  1. Separate signing authority from fundraising authority when both are held by one person — removes the concentration penalty (~12 points).

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.