Steady State
Steady State
Steady State Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Developing
Trajectory Thumbprint

Steady State

What does this mean?

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

The Path Forward

The Stewardship

Focuses on long-term sustainability and gentle cultivation of existing resources rather than forced expansion. It honors the organization's established role as a reliable anchor.

The Stewardship
The Stewardship
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Steady State
Overall
50
Score
Governance
55
Score
Financial
40
Score
Program
60
Score

Institutional Epochs

2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Steady State

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2024 Hidden Hidden Unknown
2023 Hidden Hidden 6.9% 50 Fragile Decline Risk
2022 5.3% 50 Fragile Decline Risk
2021 5.0% 55 Fragile Recovery
2020 6.1% 50 Fragile Decline Risk
2019 3.6% 55 Fragile Recovery
2018 4.7% 51 Fragile Stable Watch
2017 4.3% 51 Fragile Recovery
2016 54 Fragile Decline Risk
2015 56 Fragile Stable Watch
2014 56 Fragile Stable Watch
2013 56 Fragile Stable Watch
2012 56 Fragile Recovery
2011 52 Fragile Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2025

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
KAREN CROMER Executive Director 6.9% of Rev
STEPHEN P MILLER Board President
QUAY THOMPSON Board President
L DALE COLE Secretary
KATHY STICKLER Treasurer
MARTIN D CHALK Board Member
BETSY DALRYMPLE Board President
SCOTT R IGNASZEWSKI Board Member
ROBERT H LEWIS Board Member
KIMBERLEE BALOK MIDDAUGH ESQ Board Member
IVY D NG'OMA Board Member
L GLENN POPPLETON Board Member
HOLLY STRICKLAND Board Member
LAURY ELLEN WARD Board Member
PAM BURNS Board Member
ALAN WINSTON Board Member
CHRISTINA EPISCOPO Board Member
JOHN S MARCHESE Board Member
PAUL VERVALIN Board President

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
KAREN CROMER Executive Director 6.5% of Rev
PAUL VERVALIN Board President
STEPHEN P MILLER Board President
L DALE COLE Secretary
CHRIS GIAMMICHELE Treasurer
MARTIN D CHALK Board Member
BETSY DALRYMPLE Board Member
SCOTT R IGNASZEWSKI Board Member
ROBERT H LEWIS Board Member
KIMBERLEE BALOK MIDDAUGH ESQ Board Member
IVY D NG'OMA Board Member
L GLENN POPPLETON Board Member
HOLLY STRICKLAND Board Member
KRISTIN A SWAIN Board Member
QUAY THOMPSON Board Member
MIMI H UPDEGRAFF Board Member
LAURY ELLEN WARD Board Member
PAM BURNS Board Member
ALAN WINSTON Board Member

Tax year 2022

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
KAREN CROMER Executive Director 6.6% of Rev
PAUL VERVALIN Board President
STEPHEN P MILLER Board President
L DALE COLE Secretary
CHRIS GIAMMICHELE Treasurer
MARTIN D CHALK Board Member
BETSY DALRYMPLE Board Member
SCOTT R IGNASZEWSKI Board Member
ROBERT H LEWIS Board Member
KIMBERLEE BALOK MIDDAUGH Board Member
IVY D NG'OMA Board Member
L GLENN POPPLETON Board Member
HOLLY STRICKLAND Board Member
KRISTIN A SWAIN Board Member
QUAY THOMPSON Board Member
MIMI H UPDEGRAFF Board Member
LAURY ELLEN WARD Board Member

Tax year 2021

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
KAREN CROMER Executive Director 6.2% of Rev
KRISTIN A SWAIN Board President
MIMI H UPDEGRAFF Board President
L DALE COLE Secretary
CHRIS GIAMMICHELE Treasurer
MARTIN D CHALK Board Member
BETSY DALRYMPLE Board Member
FRED FARLEY Board Member
SCOTT R IGNASZEWSKI Board Member
ROBERT H LEWIS Board Member
JUDITH G MCINTOSH Board Member
ROBERT B MCKINNON Board Member
STEPHEN P MILLER Board Member
L GLENN POPPLETON Board Member
PAUL VERVALIN Board Member
LAURY ELLEN WARD Board Member
ALAN WINSTON Board Member
HOLLY STRICKLAND Board Member
QUAY THOMPSON Board Member
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
40 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
55 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
60 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
50 / 100
Developing

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 699 other orgs in NY with NTEE prefix A6.

Most-divergent component: program score sits 31 points above the peer median (60 vs. 29).

5-year trend: Steady State

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

No specific high-impact levers identified — this org's score is balanced across components.

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.