Acute Stabilization
Acute Stabilization
Acute Stabilization Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Priority Review
Trajectory Thumbprint

Acute Stabilization

What does this mean?

A successful crisis intervention. After hitting the Priority Review risk tier, the organization demonstrates consecutive years of Financial Score recovery paired with Governance Score improvement.

The Path Forward

The Dawn

Institutionalizes the emergency protocols that saved the organization. It locks in new, rigorous governance policies to prevent a relapse into crisis.

The Dawn
The Dawn
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Acute Stabilization ↑
Overall
34
Score
Governance
50
Score
Financial
55
Score
Program
5
Score

Institutional Epochs

2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Acute Stabilization

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2023 Hidden Hidden — 34 Critical Intervention Needed Gov Risk
2022 — — — 28 Critical Intervention Needed Gov Risk
2021 — — 66.3% 17 Critical Intervention Needed Gov Risk
2020 — — 42.3% 28 Critical Intervention Needed Gov Risk
2019 — — 40.0% 28 Critical Intervention Needed Recovery
2018 — — — 23 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2017 — — — 25 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2016 — — — 27 Critical Intervention Needed Recovery
2013 — — — 19 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2012 — — — 23 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2011 — — — 33 Critical Intervention Needed Recovery
2010 — — — 29 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2022

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
LAURENCE DRESNER Executive Director 47.0% of Rev
RAQUEL PACHAS Board President —
LOIS HOWES Board President —
DOLORES PARSONS Board Member —
ANGELA TAORMINA Board Member —
STEPHEN SCHIER Board Member —
LAURA SCHOFER Board Member —
MIRELLE TAUB Board Member —
ANTHONY J MILLER Board Member —
MISHALLE BERGER Board Member —
ROBYN WORKMAN Board Member —

Tax year 2021

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
LAURENCE DRESNER Executive Director 42.7% of Rev
LAURENCE DRESNER Executive Director 34.2% of Rev
RAQUEL PACHAS Board President —
LOIS HOWES Board President —
DOLORES PARSONS Board Member —
ANGELA TAORMINA Board Member —
STEPHEN SCHIER Board Member —
LAURA SCHOFER Board Member —
MIRELLE TAUB Board Member —
ANTHONY J MILLER Board Member —
MISHALLE BERGER Board Member —
ROBYN WORKMAN Board Member —
RAQUEL PACHAS Board President —
LOIS HOWES Board President —
DOLORES PARSONS Board Member —
ANGELA TAORMINA Board Member —
STEPHEN SCHIER Board Member —
LAURA SCHOFER Board Member —
MIRELLE TAUB Board Member —
ANTHONY J MILLER Board Member —
MISHALLE BERGER Board Member —
ROBYN WORKMAN Board Member —
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
55 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
50 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
5 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
34 / 100
Priority Review

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 806 other orgs in NY with NTEE prefix A2.

Most-divergent component: governance score sits 29 points below the peer median (50 vs. 79).

5-year trend: Acute Stabilization

A successful crisis intervention. After hitting the Priority Review risk tier, the organization demonstrates consecutive years of Financial Score recovery paired with Governance Score improvement.

Overall score has gone from 28 → 34 over 5 years (improving by 6 points).

What's driving this score

What would change this score

The two changes that would most improve this score:

  1. Stabilize program expenses or grow earned-income revenue to break the consecutive-deficit pattern (~8 points to financial score).

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.