Mission Drift
Mission Drift
Mission Drift Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Stable
Trajectory Thumbprint

Mission Drift

What does this mean?

Highly volatile revenue swings year over year paired with fluctuating Program Scores. The organization is constantly pivoting to chase restricted grant funding rather than building a sustainable core.

The Path Forward

The Lodestar

A radical recommitment to the core mission. It requires the organization to gain the strength to say 'no' to restricted funding that pulls them away from their true purpose.

The Lodestar
The Lodestar
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Mission Drift
Overall
68
Score
Governance
50
Score
Financial
100
Score
Program
30
Score

Institutional Epochs

2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Mission Drift

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2025 Hidden Hidden Unknown
2024 Hidden Hidden 68 Stable Stable Watch
2023 57 Fragile Stable Watch
2022 60 Fragile Recovery
2021 37 Fragile Decline Risk
2020 68 Stable Stable Watch
2019 61 Stable Stable Watch
2018 61 Stable Stable Watch
2017 55 Fragile Stable Watch
2016 51 Fragile Recovery
2015 43 Fragile Stable Watch
2014 43 Fragile Decline Risk
2013 51 Fragile Recovery
2012 47 Fragile Decline Risk
2011 47 Fragile Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2025

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
LAUREN ASTON Board Member
SANDRA CORSETTI Board President
SHERRI LEBLANC BOARD OBSERVER
LEI ZHAO Treasurer
DANIELLE UGALDE Board Member
RICHARD CAMMACK BOARD OBSERVER
CONNIE FOOS Board President

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
LAUREN ASTON Board Member
SANDRA CORSETTI Board President
LEI ZHAO Treasurer
EMILY BORTHWICK BOARD OBSERVER
RICHARD CAMMACK BOARD OBSERVER
CONNIE FOOS Board President

Tax year 2021

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
SANDRA CORSETTI Board President
LEI ZHAO Treasurer
EMILY BORTHWICK BOARD OBSERVER
RICHARD CAMMACK BOARD OBSERVER
NICOLE VICTORINO Board Member
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
100 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
50 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
30 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
68 / 100
Stable

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 830 other orgs in CA with NTEE prefix A6.

Most-divergent component: financial score sits 67 points above the peer median (100 vs. 33).

5-year trend: Mission Drift

Highly volatile revenue swings year over year paired with fluctuating Program Scores. The organization is constantly pivoting to chase restricted grant funding rather than building a sustainable core.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

No specific high-impact levers identified — this org's score is balanced across components.

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.