Structural Deficit
Structural Deficit
Structural Deficit Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Priority Review
Trajectory Thumbprint

Structural Deficit

What does this mean?

Persistently low financial health over 5 years despite strong programmatic output. They are borrowing from their future (or bleeding an endowment) to pay for today's programs.

The Path Forward

The Truth-Teller

Forces necessary, painful cuts to preserve the core. It demands that the organization stop borrowing from its future and align its current programmatic output with actual sustainable revenue.

The Truth-Teller
The Truth-Teller
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Structural Deficit
Overall
31
Score
Governance
45
Score
Financial
10
Score
Program
45
Score

Institutional Epochs

2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Structural Deficit

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2024 Hidden Hidden Unknown
2023 Hidden Hidden 18.9% 31 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2022 17.1% 41 Fragile Stable Watch
2021 21.2% 41 Fragile Recovery
2020 13.7% 38 Fragile Recovery
2019 15.4% 27 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch
2018 20.9% 27 Critical Intervention Needed Recovery
2017 24.5% 25 Critical Intervention Needed Recovery
2016 24.3% 24 Critical Intervention Needed Recovery
2015 39.1% 21 Critical Intervention Needed Gov Risk
2014 24 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2013 25.8% 24 Critical Intervention Needed Gov Risk
2012 21.8% 29 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2011 20.3% 41 Fragile Gov Risk

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2025

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
CLAUDIA BRUCE Treasurer 9.4% of Rev
LINDA MUSSMANN Board Member 9.4% of Rev
KIM BACH Board President
MEG CASHEN Board Member
CHERYL ROBERTS ESQ Board Member
PATRICK WANG Board Member
ZUZKA KURTZ Board Member
MAIJA REED Board Member
DANIEL KARPOWITZ Board Member
ANDREW W BARNES Board Member

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
CLAUDIA BRUCE Treasurer 9.0% of Rev
LINDA MUSSMANN Board Member 9.0% of Rev
KIM BACH Board President
MEG CASHEN Board Member
CHERYL ROBERTS ESQ Board Member
PATRICK WANG Board Member
ZUZKA KURTZ Board Member
MAIJA REED Board Member
DANIEL KARPOWITZ Board Member

Tax year 2022

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
CLAUDIA BRUCE Treasurer 8.1% of Rev
LINDA MUSSMANN Board Member 8.1% of Rev
KIM BACH Board President
MEG CASHEN Board Member
CHERYL ROBERTS ESQ Board Member
PATRICK WANG Board Member
ZUZKA KURTZ Board Member
MAIJA REED Board Member
DANIEL KARPOWITZ Board Member

Tax year 2021

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
CLAUDIA BRUCE Treasurer 7.3% of Rev
LINDA MUSSMANN Board Member 7.3% of Rev
KIM BACH Board President
MEG CASHEN Board Member
CHERYL ROBERTS ESQ Board Member
PATRICK WANG Board Member
ZUZKA KURTZ Board Member
MAIJA REED Board Member
DANIEL KARPOWITZ Board Member
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
10 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
45 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
45 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
31 / 100
Priority Review

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 699 other orgs in NY with NTEE prefix A6.

Most-divergent component: financial score sits 21 points below the peer median (10 vs. 31).

5-year trend: Structural Deficit

Persistently low financial health over 5 years despite strong programmatic output. They are borrowing from their future (or bleeding an endowment) to pay for today's programs.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

The two changes that would most improve this score:

  1. Separate signing authority from fundraising authority when both are held by one person — removes the concentration penalty (~12 points).
  2. Build cash reserves to at least 3 months of operating expenses — moves financial resilience score meaningfully (~10 points).

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.