Steady State
Steady State
Steady State Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Developing
Trajectory Thumbprint

Steady State

What does this mean?

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

The Path Forward

The Stewardship

Focuses on long-term sustainability and gentle cultivation of existing resources rather than forced expansion. It honors the organization's established role as a reliable anchor.

The Stewardship
The Stewardship
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Steady State ↑
Overall
45
Score
Governance
45
Score
Financial
40
Score
Program
60
Score

Institutional Epochs

2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Steady State

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2024 Hidden Hidden — — Unknown —
2023 — — 20.6% 45 Governance-Stressed Recovery
2022 — — 30.6% 46 Governance-Stressed Gov Risk
2021 — — 26.4% 46 Governance-Stressed Recovery
2020 — — 30.1% 30 Critical Intervention Needed Gov Risk
2019 — — 22.5% 35 Critical Intervention Needed Gov Risk
2018 — — 16.6% 41 Fragile Recovery
2017 — — 10.8% 38 Financially Distressed Stable Watch
2016 — — 11.5% 38 Fragile Recovery
2015 — — 9.5% 34 Critical Intervention Needed Recovery
2014 — — 17.2% 22 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2013 — — 22.2% 32 Critical Intervention Needed Gov Risk
2012 — — 6.6% 40 Fragile Recovery
2011 — — 10.4% 39 Fragile Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2025

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
MICHAEL ROSS Artistic Director 10.3% of Rev
LYNN HEMBEL Executive Director 10.3% of Rev
JENNIFER LATTIS Board President —
EVA MARLEY Board President —
MATTHEW CLAYTON Treasurer —
MICHELLE KRUSE Secretary —
TEAGUE MAWER Board President —
CHET AGNI Board Member —
DANIEL LYONS Board Member —
ARVINA MARTIN Board Member —
WENDY WEILER Board Member —

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
MICHAEL ROSS Artistic Director 9.0% of Rev
LYNN HEMBEL Executive Director 9.0% of Rev
TEAGUE MAWER Board President —
JENNIFER LATTIS Board President —
DAVID SCHMIEDICKE Treasurer —
DAN SINCLAIR Secretary —
LAURIE FELLENZ Board President —
MATTHEW CLAYTON Board Member —
DANIEL LYONS Board Member —
MICHELLE KRUSE Board Member —
KRIS RASMUSSEN Board Member —
ARVINA MARTIN Board Member —
WENDY WEILER Board Member —

Tax year 2022

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
MICHAEL ROSS Artistic Director 8.6% of Rev
LYNN HEMBEL Executive Director 7.4% of Rev
LAURIE FELLENZ Board President —
TEAGUE MAWER Board President —
DAVID SCHMIEDICKE Treasurer —
DAN SINCLAIR Secretary —
DAN LYONS Board President —
ELIZABETH ODDERS-WHITE Board Member —
BOB DINNDORF Board Member —
MICHELLE KRUSE Board Member —
JENNIFER LATTIS Board Member —
KRIS RASMUSSEN Board Member —
ARVINA MARTIN Board Member —
WENDY WEILER Board Member —

Tax year 2021

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
MICHAEL ROSS Artistic Director 9.8% of Rev
LYNN HEMBEL Executive Director 7.1% of Rev
LAURIE FELLENZ Board President —
TEAGUE MAWER Board President —
DAVID SCHMIEDICKE Treasurer —
DAN SINCLAIR Secretary —
DAN LYONS Board President —
ELIZABETH ODDERS-WHITE Board Member —
BOB DINNDORF Board Member —
MICHELLE KRUSE Board Member —
JENNIFER LATTIS Board Member —
KRIS RASMUSSEN Board Member —
ARVINA MARTIN Board Member —
WENDY WEILER Board Member —
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
40 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
45 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
60 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
45 / 100
Developing

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 183 other orgs in WI with NTEE prefix A6.

Most-divergent component: program score sits 32 points above the peer median (60 vs. 28).

5-year trend: Steady State

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

The two changes that would most improve this score:

  1. Separate signing authority from fundraising authority when both are held by one person — removes the concentration penalty (~12 points).

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.