Compensation Escalation Cycle
Compensation Escalation Cycle
Compensation Escalation Cycle Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Developing
Trajectory Thumbprint

Compensation Escalation Cycle

What does this mean?

Revenue grows modestly, but top officer compensation grows consistently for 5 years, breaching danger zones. The executive is negotiating aggressive raises against a compliant board.

The Path Forward

The Steward

Re-establishes board supremacy over executive extraction. It freezes compensation and mandates that all future financial rewards be tied strictly to verifiable mission expansion.

The Steward
The Steward
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Compensation Escalation Cycle
Overall
45
Score
Governance
45
Score
Financial
40
Score
Program
60
Score

Institutional Epochs

2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Compensation Escalation

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2024 Hidden Hidden Unknown
2023 Hidden Hidden 15.2% 45 Fragile Gov Risk
2022 4.8% 55 Fragile Recovery
2019 12.8% 39 Financially Distressed Decline Risk
2018 14.1% 45 Fragile Decline Risk
2017 9.1% 48 Fragile Decline Risk
2016 6.9% 50 Fragile Decline Risk
2015 4.9% 55 Fragile Recovery
2014 7.2% 46 Financially Distressed Decline Risk
2013 0.7% 49 Financially Distressed Decline Risk
2012 5.3% 50 Fragile Stable Watch
2011 6.6% 50 Fragile Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2025

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
BEVAN T KEATING Board Member 12.7% of Rev
BRUCE RENTZ Board Member 2.5% of Rev
JERRY WILD Chairman Of The Board
AMY GLOVER BRYANT Board President
JODY CARREIRO Treasurer
JANE MAGES Secretary
SUSAN ALTRUI Board Member
PEYTON BISHOP Board Member
LEE LEE DOYLE Board Member
CINDY FIELDS Board Member
LOLLY HONEA Board Member
MARGARET A JOHNSTON Board Member
SAM JONES Board Member
KAREN KURALT Board Member
STACY SELLS Board Member
BOB STOBAUGH Board Member
MARY WILDGEN Board Member
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
40 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
45 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
60 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
45 / 100
Developing

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 13 other orgs in AR with NTEE prefix A2.

Most-divergent component: program score sits 27 points above the peer median (60 vs. 33).

5-year trend: Compensation Escalation Cycle

Revenue grows modestly, but top officer compensation grows consistently for 5 years, breaching danger zones. The executive is negotiating aggressive raises against a compliant board.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

The two changes that would most improve this score:

  1. Separate signing authority from fundraising authority when both are held by one person — removes the concentration penalty (~12 points).

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.