Steady State
Steady State
Steady State Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Developing
Trajectory Thumbprint

Steady State

What does this mean?

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

The Path Forward

The Stewardship

Focuses on long-term sustainability and gentle cultivation of existing resources rather than forced expansion. It honors the organization's established role as a reliable anchor.

The Stewardship
The Stewardship
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Steady State
Overall
45
Score
Governance
45
Score
Financial
40
Score
Program
60
Score

Institutional Epochs

2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Steady State

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2023 18.8% 45 Fragile Gov Risk
2022 9.7% 54 Fragile Recovery
2021 24.3% 49 Governance-Stressed Recovery
2020 19.1% 41 Financially Distressed Decline Risk
2019 15.1% 45 Financially Distressed Decline Risk
2018 5.7% 50 Fragile Decline Risk
2017 5.7% 50 Fragile Decline Risk
2016 5.0% 55 Fragile Recovery
2015 6.7% 50 Fragile Decline Risk
2014 5.4% 54 Fragile Recovery
2013 12.5% 46 Financially Distressed Decline Risk
2012 14.8% 48 Fragile Recovery
2011 16.0% 47 Fragile Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Lawrence M Golan Board Member 11.1% of Rev
David Rogers Executive Dir. 6.6% of Rev
Kimberly Ruck Board Member
Roshelle Pavlin Board President
Neal Lessenger Secretary
Doug Armstrong Treasurer
Mitzi Casey Board President
Jerry Gibbons Board Member
Jonathan Smith Board Member
Tanya Knickerbocker Board Member
Jason Matson Board Member
Megan Murphy Board President
Lawrence A Peterson Board Member
Rosemary A Gottlieb At Large
Corinne Murphy-Hines At Large
Paul Reiss MD Board Member
Amae Merrill Representative
Mary Sundquist Representative

Tax year 2022

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Lawrence M Golan Board Member 10.6% of Rev
David Rogers Executive Dir. 6.5% of Rev
Rebecca E Scholl Board President
Roshelle Pavlin Board President
Neal Lessenger Secretary
Doug Armstrong Treasurer
Mitzi Casey Board Member
Ken Bergevin EdD Board Member
Jerry Gibbons Board Member
Jonathan Smith Board Member
Tanya Knickerbocker Board Member
Jason Matson Board Member
Megan Murphy Board President
Lawrence A Peterson Board Member
John Rossmeissl Board Member
Rosemary A Gottlieb At Large
Corinne Murphy-Hines At Large
Paul Reiss MD Board Member
Amae Merrill Representative
Mary Sundquist Representative

Tax year 2021

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Lawrence M Golan Board Member 10.1% of Rev
David Rogers Executive Dir. 6.5% of Rev
Rebecca E Scholl Board President
Roshelle Pavlin Board President
Neal Lessenger Secretary
Doug Armstrong Treasurer
Mitzi Casey Board Member
Ken Bergevin EdD Board Member
Jerry Gibbons Board Member
Jon Fassett Board Member
Tanya Knickerbocker Board Member
Paul Landry Board Member
Jason Matson Board Member
Megan Murphy Board President
Lawrence A Peterson Board Member
John Rossmeissl Board Member
Julianne Wilson Board Member
Rosemary A Gottlieb At Large
Corinne Murphy-Hines At Large
Paul Reiss MD Board Member
Amae Merrill Representative
Mary Sundquist Representative
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
40 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
45 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
60 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
45 / 100
Developing

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 235 other orgs in WA with NTEE prefix A6.

Most-divergent component: program score sits 28 points above the peer median (60 vs. 32).

5-year trend: Steady State

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

Overall score has gone from 45 → 45 over 5 years (stable by 0 points).

What's driving this score

What would change this score

The two changes that would most improve this score:

  1. Separate signing authority from fundraising authority when both are held by one person — removes the concentration penalty (~12 points).

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.