Steady State
Steady State
Steady State Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Priority Review
Trajectory Thumbprint

Steady State

What does this mean?

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

The Path Forward

The Stewardship

Focuses on long-term sustainability and gentle cultivation of existing resources rather than forced expansion. It honors the organization's established role as a reliable anchor.

The Stewardship
The Stewardship
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Steady State ↑
Overall
43
Score
Governance
50
Score
Financial
45
Score
Program
30
Score

Institutional Epochs

2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Steady State

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2024 — — — 43 Fragile Recovery
2023 Hidden Hidden 12.7% 45 Fragile Recovery
2022 — — — 37 Fragile Recovery
2021 — — 22.6% 41 Fragile Recovery
2020 — — 15.2% 37 Fragile Recovery
2018 — — — 37 Financially Distressed Recovery
2017 — — — 31 Critical Intervention Needed Recovery
2015 — — — 29 Critical Intervention Needed Recovery
2014 — — — 25 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2013 — — — 39 Fragile Recovery
2012 — — — 31 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch
2011 — — — 35 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
CINDY GERLACH Executive Director 15.2% of Rev
MARCY MILLER Board Member —
ROGER BENNETT Board President —
JOHN POLLES Board President —
VICKI BOWER Treasurer —
MALATHI RAGHAVAN Board Member —
CATHERINE SANDHAGE Board Member —
CONNIE WORKMAN Board Member —
WILLIAM MCINERNEY Board President —
EMILY OHLAND Board Member —
GAIL POLLES Board Member —
SARA SHOOP Secretary —
STEVE WIEN Board Member —
GAIL BRICKLER Board Member —
HILARY COOKE Board Member —
BETH DANA Board Member —
VINCENT GUIDO Board Member —
SCOTT HINES Board Member —
SALLIE JANOWIAK Board Member —
SHEILA KLINKER Board Member —
RONALD MAHRLING JR Board Member —

Tax year 2022

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
CINDY GERLACH Executive Director 14.9% of Rev
GAIL BRICKLER Board Member —
HILARY COOKE Board Member —
BETH DANA Board Member —
VINCENT GUIDO Board Member —
SCOTT HINES Board Member —
SALLIE JANOWIAK Board Member —
SHEILA KLINKER Board Member —
RONALD MAHRLING JR Board Member —
MARCY MILLER Board Member —
ROGER BENNETT Board President —
JOHN POLLES Board President —
VICKI BOWER Treasurer —
MALATHI RAGHAVAN Board Member —
CATHERINE SANDHAGE Board Member —
CONNIE WORKMAN Board Member —
WILLIAM MCINERNEY Board President —
EMILY OHLAND Board Member —
GAIL POLLES Board Member —
SARA SHOOP Secretary —
STEVE WIEN Board Member —

Tax year 2021

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
DONNA PETERSON ASST ADMINIS 14.6% of Rev
MARCY MILLER Board President —
ROGER BENNETT Board President —
WILLIAM LAPCHESKA Board President —
RICHARD LODDE Treasurer —
EMILY ULRICH Secretary —
DANIEL BERGER Board Member —
GAIL BRICKLER Board Member —
BETH DANA Board Member —
TED FONDAK Board Member —
DAWN HAYS Board Member —
SALLIE JANOWIAK Board Member —
SHEILA KLINKER Board Member —
RONALD MAHRLING JR Board Member —
WILLIAM MCINERNEY Board Member —
PETER MECKL Board Member —
EMILY OHLAND Board Member —
GAIL POLLES Board Member —
RACHEL RAVELLETTE Board Member —
SARA SHOOP Board Member —
STEVE WIEN Board Member —
CINDY GERLACH Executive Director —
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
45 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
50 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
30 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
43 / 100
Priority Review

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 181 other orgs in IN with NTEE prefix A6.

Most-divergent component: governance score sits 12 points below the peer median (50 vs. 62).

5-year trend: Steady State

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

Overall score has gone from 37 → 43 over 5 years (improving by 6 points).

What's driving this score

What would change this score

No specific high-impact levers identified — this org's score is balanced across components.

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.