Steady State
Steady State
Steady State Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Priority Review
Trajectory Thumbprint

Steady State

What does this mean?

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

The Path Forward

The Stewardship

Focuses on long-term sustainability and gentle cultivation of existing resources rather than forced expansion. It honors the organization's established role as a reliable anchor.

The Stewardship
The Stewardship
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Steady State
Overall
24
Score
Governance
50
Score
Financial
0
Score
Program
15
Score

Institutional Epochs

2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Steady State

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2020 24 Critical Intervention Needed Recovery
2019 31 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2018 57 Fragile Stable Watch
2017 57 Fragile Stable Watch
2016 57 Fragile Stable Watch
2014 57 Fragile Recovery
2013 33 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2012 35 Financially Distressed Recovery
2011 21 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2021

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
NATE HEFFRON Board President
DIANE DARLINGTON Board President
LEX EXWORTHY Treasurer
LISA BOWERS Secretary
VIC HOLIDAY Board Member
RUSTY BOWERS Board Member
KELSEY ROUTHIER Board Member
LESLIE PARKKONEN Board Member
ELIISA GLADWELL Board Member
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
0 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
50 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
15 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
24 / 100
Priority Review

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 45 other orgs in MI with NTEE prefix A2.

Most-divergent component: financial score sits 44 points below the peer median (0 vs. 44).

5-year trend: Steady State

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

Overall score has gone from 57 → 24 over 5 years (declining by 33 points). A multi-year directional move of this magnitude is a signal worth investigating.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

The two changes that would most improve this score:

  1. Build cash reserves to at least 3 months of operating expenses — moves financial resilience score meaningfully (~10 points).

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.