Compensation Escalation Cycle
Compensation Escalation Cycle
Compensation Escalation Cycle Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Developing
Trajectory Thumbprint

Compensation Escalation Cycle

What does this mean?

Revenue grows modestly, but top officer compensation grows consistently for 5 years, breaching danger zones. The executive is negotiating aggressive raises against a compliant board.

The Path Forward

The Steward

Re-establishes board supremacy over executive extraction. It freezes compensation and mandates that all future financial rewards be tied strictly to verifiable mission expansion.

The Steward
The Steward
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Compensation Escalation Cycle ↑
Overall
45
Score
Governance
45
Score
Financial
50
Score
Program
45
Score

Institutional Epochs

2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Compensation Escalation

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2025 Hidden Hidden — — Unknown —
2024 Hidden Hidden — — Unknown —
2023 Hidden Hidden 17.3% 45 Fragile Gov Risk
2022 — — 14.4% 45 Fragile Recovery
2021 — — 41.4% 35 Critical Intervention Needed Gov Risk
2020 — — 43.3% 36 Governance-Stressed Gov Risk
2019 — — 8.6% 54 Fragile Recovery
2018 — — 10.9% 39 Fragile Recovery
2017 — — 13.7% 29 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2016 — — 14.2% 31 Critical Intervention Needed Recovery
2015 — — 17.1% 33 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2014 — — 9.5% 40 Fragile Recovery
2013 — — 14.7% 26 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2012 — — 17.0% 27 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2011 — — 11.2% 35 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2025

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
BETHEL BALGE Executive Director 19.0% of Rev
BETHEL BALGE Executive Director 17.3% of Rev
CHRISTOPHER PAUL Board President —
ANDREW MCNAMARA Board President —
THOMAS LENTZ Treasurer —
VIKTORIA DAVIS Secretary —
SARAH HOULE Board Member —
MELINDA WEDZINA Board Member —
ERIC WOLLER Board Member —
JOE MEIDL Board Member —
KATIE HEINTZ Board Member —
ANNA BROWN Board Member —
JOHN KIND Board Member —
ANDREW WILLAERT Board Member —
ANDREW MCNAMARA Board President —
ANDREW WILLAERT Board President —
THOMAS LENTZ Treasurer —
MELINDA WEDZINA Secretary —
ANN FREDRICKSON Board Member —
ANNA BROWN Board Member —
CHRISTOPHER PAUL Board Member —
JOE MEIDL Board Member —
SARAH HOULE Board Member —
KATIE HEINTZ Board Member —
ERIC WOLLER Board Member —
JOHN KIND Board Member —

Tax year 2022

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
BETHEL BALGE Executive Director 16.9% of Rev
SARAH HOULE Board Member 0.1% of Rev
BENJAMIN FINDLEY Board President —
CHRISTOPHER PAUL Board President —
DAVID KNOPICK Treasurer —
VIKTORIA DAVIS Secretary —
ANDREW MCNAMARA Board Member —
NATALIYA DANYLKOVA Board Member —
JENNIFER FAUST Board Member —
MARCIA JAGODZINSKE Board Member —
JARED KOCH Board Member —
JOHN MAXWELL Board Member —
STEPHANIE THORPE Board Member —
MELINDA WEDZINA Board Member —

Tax year 2021

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
BETHEL BALGE Executive Director 15.2% of Rev
SARAH HOULE Board Member 0.1% of Rev
BENJAMIN FINDLEY Board President —
CHRISTOPHER PAUL Board President —
DAVID KNOPICK Treasurer —
VIKTORIA DAVIS Secretary —
SHANNON BEAL Board President —
NATALIYA DANYLKOVA Board Member —
JENNIFER FAUST Board Member —
MARCIA JAGODZINSKE Board Member —
JARED KOCH Board Member —
JOHN MAXWELL Board Member —
STEPHANIE THORPE Board Member —
MELINDA WEDZINA Board Member —
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
50 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
45 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
45 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
45 / 100
Developing

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 256 other orgs in MN with NTEE prefix A6.

Most-divergent component: governance score sits 16 points below the peer median (45 vs. 61).

5-year trend: Compensation Escalation Cycle

Revenue grows modestly, but top officer compensation grows consistently for 5 years, breaching danger zones. The executive is negotiating aggressive raises against a compliant board.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

The two changes that would most improve this score:

  1. Separate signing authority from fundraising authority when both are held by one person — removes the concentration penalty (~12 points).

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.