Insufficient Data
At least 3 years of filing history are required to project a trajectory.
Insufficient Data
Market
Archetype
Mechanical
Natural
Tier
Stable
Trajectory Thumbprint
Insufficient Data
What does this mean?
Not enough historical data to determine a longitudinal pattern.
Institutional Health Scores
Overall
54
Score
Governance
50
Score
Financial
75
Score
Program
15
Score
Title
-
Institutions
-
Avg Revenue
-
Risk Profile
Representative Institutions
Institutional Epochs
2023
2024
2025
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Insufficient Data
Historical Performance
| Year | Revenue | Top Comp | Comp % Rev | Score | Phase Label | Outlook | Details |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | Hidden | Hidden | — | — | Unknown | — | |
| 2024 | — | — | — | 54 | Fragile | Stable Watch |
Officer compensation history
Tax year 2025
| Name | Title | Phone | Compensation | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| DOUG OLSON | Board President | — | ||
| LEANNE PHILIPS | Treasurer | — | ||
| KEVIN LINDER | Board Member | — | ||
| DWAIN WILMOT | Board Member | — | ||
| MARK PHILIPS | Board Member | — | ||
| VAL PHILIPS | Board Member | — | ||
| MICHAEL HARRIS | Board Member | — | ||
| ALEX PICK | Board Member | — | ||
| RYAN SCHUKNECHT | Board Member | — | ||
| PAM ANDERSON | Board Member | — |
Tax year 2023
| Name | Title | Phone | Compensation | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| TIM BLUM | Board Member | — | ||
| DWAIN WILMOT | Board Member | — | ||
| MARK PHILIPS | Board Member | — | ||
| VAL PHILIPS | Board Member | — | ||
| MICHAEL HARRIS | Board Member | — | ||
| ALEX PICK | Board Member | — | ||
| RYAN SCHUKNECHT | Board Member | — | ||
| DOUG OLSON | Board President | — | ||
| JULIE BRIETBARTH | Secretary | — | ||
| LEANNE PHILIPS | Treasurer | — |
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown
Score breakdown
Financial resilience
75 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
50 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
15 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
54 / 100
Stable
The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →
Peer comparison
Compared to 85 other orgs in IA with NTEE prefix A6.
Most-divergent component: financial score sits 36 points above the peer median (75 vs. 39).
5-year trend: Insufficient Data
Not enough historical data to determine a longitudinal pattern.
What's driving this score
- No individual risk drivers stand out. Overall score reflects component balance, not any single signal.
What would change this score
No specific high-impact levers identified — this org's score is balanced across components.
Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.