Steady State
Steady State
Steady State Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Stable
Trajectory Thumbprint

Steady State

What does this mean?

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

The Path Forward

The Stewardship

Focuses on long-term sustainability and gentle cultivation of existing resources rather than forced expansion. It honors the organization's established role as a reliable anchor.

The Stewardship
The Stewardship
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Steady State
Overall
47
Score
Governance
50
Score
Financial
55
Score
Program
30
Score

Institutional Epochs

2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Steady State

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2023 47 Fragile Stable Watch
2022 50 Fragile Recovery
2021 47 Fragile Stable Watch
2020 47 Fragile Recovery
2019 37 Fragile Recovery
2018 37 Fragile Decline Risk
2017 33 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch
2016 33 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2014 37 Fragile Decline Risk
2013 42 Fragile Decline Risk
2012 47 Fragile Recovery
2011 41 Fragile Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
KEVIN CARTWRIGHT Board President
MANUEL ROSALES Board President
ANGIE HOUGEN Treasurer
MARK HERMAN Secretary
MARK HERMAN Secretary
KEVIN CARTWRIGHT Board Member
STIRLING YEARIAN Board Member
ANDRE RIGDEN Board President
ANGELA HOUGEN Treasurer
CHARLTON QUINN Board President
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
55 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
50 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
30 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
47 / 100
Stable

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 12 other orgs in CA with NTEE prefix A0.

Most-divergent component: financial score sits 31 points above the peer median (55 vs. 24).

5-year trend: Steady State

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

Overall score has gone from 37 → 47 over 5 years (improving by 10 points). A multi-year directional move of this magnitude is a signal worth investigating.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

No specific high-impact levers identified — this org's score is balanced across components.

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.