Mission Drift
Mission Drift
Mission Drift Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Priority Review
Trajectory Thumbprint

Mission Drift

What does this mean?

Highly volatile revenue swings year over year paired with fluctuating Program Scores. The organization is constantly pivoting to chase restricted grant funding rather than building a sustainable core.

The Path Forward

The Lodestar

A radical recommitment to the core mission. It requires the organization to gain the strength to say 'no' to restricted funding that pulls them away from their true purpose.

The Lodestar
The Lodestar
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Mission Drift
Overall
41
Score
Governance
50
Score
Financial
55
Score
Program
5
Score

Institutional Epochs

2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Mission Drift

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2021 41 Fragile Decline Risk
2020 68 Stable Stable Watch
2019 58 Fragile Recovery
2018 47 Fragile Decline Risk
2017 51 Fragile Decline Risk
2016 55 Fragile Recovery
2015 51 Fragile Stable Watch
2014 51 Fragile Recovery
2013 1.1% 42 Fragile Recovery
2012 51 Fragile Stable Watch
2011 47 Fragile Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2022

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
TONYA HESKETT Board President
ROBIN AUSTIN Treasurer
LADY HOLLY HATHAWAY KAOUGH ARTIST DIREC

Tax year 2021

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
TONYA HESKETT Board President
DE ANN ROSTEET PAST PRESIDE
JENNIFER REINAUER VICE PRESIDE
ROBIN AUSTIN Treasurer
DENYS O'NEAL Secretary
LADY HOLLY HATHAWAY KAOUGH ARTIST DIREC
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
55 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
50 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
5 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
41 / 100
Priority Review

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 50 other orgs in LA with NTEE prefix A6.

Most-divergent component: program score sits 28 points below the peer median (5 vs. 33).

5-year trend: Mission Drift

Highly volatile revenue swings year over year paired with fluctuating Program Scores. The organization is constantly pivoting to chase restricted grant funding rather than building a sustainable core.

Overall score has gone from 51 → 41 over 5 years (declining by 10 points). A multi-year directional move of this magnitude is a signal worth investigating.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

No specific high-impact levers identified — this org's score is balanced across components.

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.