Mission Drift
Mission Drift
Mission Drift Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Developing
Trajectory Thumbprint

Mission Drift

What does this mean?

Highly volatile revenue swings year over year paired with fluctuating Program Scores. The organization is constantly pivoting to chase restricted grant funding rather than building a sustainable core.

The Path Forward

The Lodestar

A radical recommitment to the core mission. It requires the organization to gain the strength to say 'no' to restricted funding that pulls them away from their true purpose.

The Lodestar
The Lodestar
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Mission Drift ↑
Overall
53
Score
Governance
45
Score
Financial
60
Score
Program
60
Score

Institutional Epochs

2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Mission Drift

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2025 Hidden Hidden — — Unknown —
2024 — — 16.2% 53 Fragile Gov Risk
2023 — — 15.1% 53 Fragile Recovery
2022 — — 19.3% 41 Fragile Gov Risk
2021 — — 13.2% 55 Fragile Recovery
2020 — — 18.7% 39 Fragile Decline Risk
2019 — — 28.3% 40 Critical Intervention Needed Gov Risk
2018 — — 15.9% 45 Financially Distressed Decline Risk
2017 — — 12.7% 52 Fragile Decline Risk
2016 — — 6.5% 54 Fragile Stable Watch
2015 — — 8.1% 54 Fragile Recovery
2014 — — 12.4% 45 Financially Distressed Decline Risk
2013 — — 12.3% 50 Financially Distressed Decline Risk
2012 — — 13.9% 49 Fragile Stable Watch
2011 — — 14.3% 49 Fragile Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2025

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
CAROLINE GWINN Executive Dir. 16.3% of Rev
CHRISTOPHER EMANUEL Board Member —
REV LOGAN FORD Board Member —
LIDDIE HANSEN Board President —
DEL HICKEY Board Member —
ROBBIE ROBB AIK ARTST GUILD —
FRED STURDIVANT Board Member —
GAIL EBNER Board Member —
NICOLE MORGAN Board Member —
CISSIE SULLIVAN Board Member —
DR ANGEL RANALES Board Member —
SARAH MALABY Board Member —
KEVIN MOLONY Board Member —
GRAHAM HALL Board Member —
REBECCA COLE Board President —
SUZANNE OZMENT Secretary —
MALLORY HOLLEY Board Member —
COLLEEN CHANDLER Treasurer —
CATHY MERRIFIELD Board Member —
JOSHUA STEWART Board Member —
BARBARA SMOAK Board Member —
NOBLE DILLER Board Member —
MARY TILTON CITY OF AIKEN —
ALEX VLAHOS Board Member —

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
CAROLINE GWINN Executive Dir. 14.5% of Rev
DR JEREMY CULLER Board Member —
TRIP BUCHANAN Board President —
CARLA RABUN Board Member —
ANDREW DORAN Board Member —
CHERYL CUMMINGS Board Member —
LYDDIE HANSEN Board President —
MARY CATHERINE LAWTON EX OFFICIO —
NICOLE MORGAN Board Member —
CISSIE SULLIVAN Board Member —
SUZANNE JACKSON Secretary —
SARAH MALABY Board Member —
KEVIN MOLONY Board Member —
GRAHAM HALL Board Member —
REBECCA COLE Board President —
SUZANNE OZMENT Board Member —
KAREY SANTOS Board Member —
COLLEEN CHANDLER Board Member —
GARY WERTZ Board Member —
GRAHAM REYNOLDS Treasurer —
BARBARA SMOAK Board Member —
NOBLE DILLER Board Member —

Tax year 2021

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
CAROLINE GWINN Executive Dir. 13.3% of Rev
DR JEREMY CULLER Board Member —
TRIP BUCHANAN Chairman —
CARLA RABUN Board Member —
ANDREW DORAN Board Member —
BYRON BUSH Board Member —
LYDDIE HANSEN Board President —
PAT MOORE Board Member —
TERRIE BOLON Board Member —
CISSIE SULLIVAN Board Member —
SUZANNE JACKSON Board Member —
SARAH MALABY Board Member —
KEVIN MOLONY Board Member —
GRAHAM HALL Board Member —
REBECCA COLE Board Member —
SUZANNE OZMENT Board Member —
CHRIS MCKEEL Board Member —
SHARON HAGAN Secretary —
RICK OSBON EX-OFFICIO —
GRAHAM REYNOLDS Board Member —
BARBARA SMOAK Board President —
MIKE HOSANG Board Member —
AL SORENSEN Treasurer —
STUART BEDENBAUGH EX-OFFICIO —
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
60 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
45 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
60 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
53 / 100
Developing

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 5 other orgs in SC with NTEE prefix A4.

Most-divergent component: governance score sits 26 points below the peer median (45 vs. 71).

5-year trend: Mission Drift

Highly volatile revenue swings year over year paired with fluctuating Program Scores. The organization is constantly pivoting to chase restricted grant funding rather than building a sustainable core.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

The two changes that would most improve this score:

  1. Separate signing authority from fundraising authority when both are held by one person — removes the concentration penalty (~12 points).

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.