Mission Drift
Mission Drift
Mission Drift Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Stable
Trajectory Thumbprint

Mission Drift

What does this mean?

Highly volatile revenue swings year over year paired with fluctuating Program Scores. The organization is constantly pivoting to chase restricted grant funding rather than building a sustainable core.

The Path Forward

The Lodestar

A radical recommitment to the core mission. It requires the organization to gain the strength to say 'no' to restricted funding that pulls them away from their true purpose.

The Lodestar
The Lodestar
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Mission Drift ↑
Overall
51
Score
Governance
50
Score
Financial
40
Score
Program
60
Score

Institutional Epochs

2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Mission Drift

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2025 Hidden Hidden — — Unknown —
2024 Hidden Hidden — — Unknown —
2023 Hidden Hidden — 51 Fragile Recovery
2022 — — — 35 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2021 — — — 52 Fragile Recovery
2020 — — — 44 Financially Distressed Recovery
2019 — — — 38 Financially Distressed Recovery
2018 — — — 45 Fragile Recovery
2017 — — — 37 Financially Distressed Decline Risk
2016 — — — 45 Fragile Recovery
2015 — — — 37 Financially Distressed Stable Watch
2014 — — — 41 Financially Distressed Stable Watch
2013 — — — 37 Financially Distressed Stable Watch
2012 — — — 37 Financially Distressed Decline Risk
2011 — — — 45 Fragile Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2026

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
JESSICA SCHLEY Board President —
KATIE MALLORY VICE PRESIDE —
AMY RAMPINELLI Secretary —
JORDAN HOGG Treasurer —
FRANCENE BARBRO-MEINERS Board Member —
DEBRA BEEBE Board Member —
BRENDA GARLAND Board Member —
CHERYLE JOHNSON Board Member —
DAWN ROSE Board Member —
ZACH SCHLEY Board Member —
JOANNE WELIHAN Board Member —

Tax year 2025

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
JESSICA SCHLEY Board President —
KATIE MALLORY VICE PRESIDE —
AMY RAMPINELLI Secretary —
JORDAN HOGG Treasurer —
FRANCENE BARBRO-MEINERS Board Member —
DEBRA BEEBE Board Member —
BRENDA GARLAND Board Member —
CHERYLE JOHNSON Board Member —
DAWN ROSE Board Member —
ZACH SCHLEY Board Member —
JOANNE WELIHAN Board Member —

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
KATHLEEN LEH Board President —
STEVEN BRISSON VICE PRESIDE —
KATIE MALLORY Secretary —
JORDAN HOGG Treasurer —
DAWN ROSE Board Member —
AARON GAUTHIER Board Member —
MICHAEL EKDAHL Board Member —
DEBRA BEEBE Board Member —
PAM MCCABE Board Member —
JENNY HAYDEN Board Member —
JOANNE WELIHAN Board Member —
SANDY REUSCH Board Member —
JESSICA SMITH Board Member —

Tax year 2022

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
KATHLEEN LEH Board President —
STEVEN BRISSON VICE PRESIDE —
PAM MCCABE Secretary —
JENNY HAYDEN Treasurer —
DAWN ROSE Board Member —
JOANNE WELIHAN Board Member —
JORDAN HOGG Board Member —
DEBRA BEEBE Board Member —
AARON GAUTHIER Board Member —
MICHAEL EKDAHL Board Member —
KATIE MALLORY Board Member —
MARY KAY HODSON Board Member —
GRETCHEN MCCLYMONT Board Member —
SANDY REUSCH Board Member —
JESSICA SMITH Board Member —

Tax year 2021

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
KATHLEEN LEH Board President —
STEVEN BRISSON VICE PRESIDE —
PAM MCCABE Secretary —
JENNY HAYDEN Treasurer —
DAWN ROSE Board Member —
AARON GAUTHIER Board Member —
MICHAEL EKDAHL Board Member —
MARY KAY HODSON Board Member —
KATIE MALLORY Board Member —
GRETCHEN MCCYMONT Board Member —
KATHY KING-JOHNSON EXECUTIVE DI —
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
40 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
50 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
60 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
51 / 100
Stable

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 177 other orgs in MI with NTEE prefix A2.

Most-divergent component: financial score sits 31 points below the peer median (40 vs. 71).

5-year trend: Mission Drift

Highly volatile revenue swings year over year paired with fluctuating Program Scores. The organization is constantly pivoting to chase restricted grant funding rather than building a sustainable core.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

No specific high-impact levers identified — this org's score is balanced across components.

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.