Structural Deficit
Structural Deficit
Structural Deficit Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Priority Review
Trajectory Thumbprint

Structural Deficit

"Enriches lives through high-quality music instruction for all ages and skill levels, making music education universally accessible and fostering a lifelong passion for music."

— Statement of Program Service Accomplishments

What does this mean?

Persistently low financial health over 5 years despite strong programmatic output. They are borrowing from their future (or bleeding an endowment) to pay for today's programs.

The Path Forward

The Truth-Teller

Forces necessary, painful cuts to preserve the core. It demands that the organization stop borrowing from its future and align its current programmatic output with actual sustainable revenue.

The Truth-Teller
The Truth-Teller
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Structural Deficit
Overall
38
Score
Governance
55
Score
Financial
10
Score
Program
60
Score

Institutional Epochs

2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Structural Deficit

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2025 Hidden Hidden Unknown
2024 Hidden Hidden Unknown
2023 Hidden Hidden 7.7% 38 Financially Distressed Decline Risk
2022 6.8% 40 Financially Distressed Recovery
2021 8.6% 36 Financially Distressed Decline Risk
2020 7.4% 38 Financially Distressed Decline Risk
2019 8.4% 40 Financially Distressed Recovery
2018 7.1% 36 Financially Distressed Decline Risk
2017 8.0% 40 Financially Distressed Stable Watch
2016 7.1% 40 Financially Distressed Recovery
2015 11.3% 34 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch
2014 2.8% 37 Financially Distressed Decline Risk
2013 7.5% 38 Financially Distressed Stable Watch
2012 8.0% 38 Financially Distressed Recovery
2011 8.0% 36 Financially Distressed Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2025

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Matthew Keating Executive Dir. 8.4% of Rev
Matthew Keating Executive Dir. 7.7% of Rev
Lee Waggener Board President
Stuart M Davis Board President
Win Aldrich Secretary
Carol Hersch Development
John Burdett Board Member
Sandra Lee Board Member
Gabe Petrocelli Board Member
Su-San Yio Board Member
Mark MacKenzie Board Member
Lee Waggener Board President
Stuart M Davis Board President
Win Aldrich Secretary
David Sawhill Treasurer
Carol Hersch Development
John Burdett Board Member
Sandra Lee Board Member
Gabe Petrocelli Board Member
Su-San Yio Board Member
Mark MacKenzie Board Member

Tax year 2022

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Matthew Keating Executive Dir. 6.2% of Rev
Sandra Lee Board Member
Gabe Petrocelli Board Member
Su-San Yio Board Member
Lee Waggener Board President
Stuart M Davis Board President
Win Aldrich Secretary
Danielle Witten Treasurer
Carol Hersch Development
John Burdett Board Member

Tax year 2021

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Matthew Keating Executive Dir. 6.2% of Rev
Lee Waggener Board President
Stuart M Davis Board President
Win Aldrich Secretary
Danielle Witten Treasurer
Carol Hersch Development
John Burdett Board Member
Sandra Lee Board Member
Gabe Petrocelli Board Member
Su-San Yio Board Member
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
10 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
55 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
60 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
38 / 100
Priority Review

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 829 other orgs in CA with NTEE prefix A6.

Most-divergent component: program score sits 29 points above the peer median (60 vs. 31).

5-year trend: Structural Deficit

Persistently low financial health over 5 years despite strong programmatic output. They are borrowing from their future (or bleeding an endowment) to pay for today's programs.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

The two changes that would most improve this score:

  1. Build cash reserves to at least 3 months of operating expenses — moves financial resilience score meaningfully (~10 points).

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.