Steady State
Steady State
Steady State Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Stable
Trajectory Thumbprint

Steady State

"Supports the Los Angeles Philharmonic Orchestra through fundraising, audience development, and promoting music education for youth, fostering music appreciation in the community."

— Statement of Program Service Accomplishments

What does this mean?

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

The Path Forward

The Stewardship

Focuses on long-term sustainability and gentle cultivation of existing resources rather than forced expansion. It honors the organization's established role as a reliable anchor.

The Stewardship
The Stewardship
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Steady State
Overall
47
Score
Governance
50
Score
Financial
55
Score
Program
30
Score

Institutional Epochs

2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Steady State

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2024 47 Fragile Decline Risk
2023 Hidden Hidden 51 Fragile Stable Watch
2022 51 Fragile Recovery
2021 25 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2020 30 Critical Intervention Needed Recovery
2019 45 Fragile Recovery
2018 35 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2017 45 Fragile Decline Risk
2016 61 Stable Stable Watch
2015 61 Stable Stable Watch
2014 55 Fragile Recovery
2013 35 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2012 39 Fragile Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2021

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
ALICIA MANIATAKIS Vice President
JEAN STRICKLAND Vice President
VAL NOGUCHI RECORD SECRETAR
MARION HALL Vice President
DONNA LEE YURI KANTOR Vice President
ELLEN PERKINS Board President
KAREN CAMERON Treasurer
PAM IRWIN Secretary
JUDY SANNES TRSR FUND EVENT
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
55 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
50 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
30 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
47 / 100
Stable

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 829 other orgs in CA with NTEE prefix A6.

Most-divergent component: financial score sits 22 points above the peer median (55 vs. 33).

5-year trend: Steady State

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

Overall score has gone from 30 → 47 over 5 years (improving by 17 points). A multi-year directional move of this magnitude is a signal worth investigating.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

No specific high-impact levers identified — this org's score is balanced across components.

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.