Steady State
Steady State
Steady State Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Stable
Trajectory Thumbprint

Steady State

What does this mean?

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

The Path Forward

The Stewardship

Focuses on long-term sustainability and gentle cultivation of existing resources rather than forced expansion. It honors the organization's established role as a reliable anchor.

The Stewardship
The Stewardship
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Steady State
Overall
46
Score
Governance
50
Score
Financial
55
Score
Program
15
Score

Institutional Epochs

2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Steady State

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2020 46 Fragile Recovery
2019 57 Fragile Stable Watch
2018 57 Fragile Stable Watch
2017 57 Fragile Stable Watch
2016 55 Fragile Decline Risk
2015 65 Stable Stable Watch
2012 55 Fragile Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2021

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Lisa Naig Board President
William Roberts Board President
Pete Grady Secretary
Kevin Jensen Treasurer
Peggy Schoer House Manager
Rick Gooding Board Member
Lisa Naig Board President
Ken Walton Stage Manager
William Roberts Board President
Barb Lageschulte Board Member
Pete Grady Secretary
Sheryl Duden Publicity Manager
Kevin Jensen Treasurer
Ken Hobz Board Memeber
Peggy Schoer House Manager
Nathan Bloomquist Board Member
Rick Gooding Board Member
Emily Stone Board Member
Ken Walton Stage Manager
Barb Lageschulte Board Member
Sheryl Duden Publicity Manager
Ken Hobz Board Memeber
Nathan Bloomquist Board Member
Emily Stone Board Member
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
55 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
50 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
15 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
46 / 100
Stable

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 85 other orgs in IA with NTEE prefix A6.

Most-divergent component: financial score sits 16 points above the peer median (55 vs. 39).

5-year trend: Steady State

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

Overall score has gone from 55 → 46 over 5 years (declining by 9 points).

What's driving this score

What would change this score

No specific high-impact levers identified — this org's score is balanced across components.

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.