Structural Deficit
Structural Deficit
Structural Deficit Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Priority Review
Trajectory Thumbprint

Structural Deficit

What does this mean?

Persistently low financial health over 5 years despite strong programmatic output. They are borrowing from their future (or bleeding an endowment) to pay for today's programs.

The Path Forward

The Truth-Teller

Forces necessary, painful cuts to preserve the core. It demands that the organization stop borrowing from its future and align its current programmatic output with actual sustainable revenue.

The Truth-Teller
The Truth-Teller
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Structural Deficit
Overall
35
Score
Governance
58
Score
Financial
0
Score
Program
60
Score

Institutional Epochs

2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Structural Deficit

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2024 Hidden Hidden Unknown
2023 4.5% 35 Financially Distressed Decline Risk
2022 8.8% 34 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2021 8.8% 36 Financially Distressed Decline Risk
2020 8.2% 42 Financially Distressed Decline Risk
2019 9.9% 32 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2018 10.4% 32 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2017 10.3% 32 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2016 10.0% 34 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2015 9.0% 34 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2014 4.8% 35 Financially Distressed Decline Risk
2013 4.7% 35 Financially Distressed Decline Risk
2012 6.5% 36 Financially Distressed Stable Watch
2011 9.4% 36 Financially Distressed Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2025

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Shelley Best Executive Director 3.4% of Rev
Amanda Roy Executive Director 2.5% of Rev
Stanley Harasimowitz Board Member
Michael A Pignatella Board Member
Chip McCabe Board Member
T'Challa Williams Board Member
Stephen Jackson Board Member
Brian Refici Board Member
Ashanti Osborne Martin Board Member
Rev Miguelina Howell Board Member
June Archer Board Member
Rose Curiel Board Member
Maria Perez Brown Board Member
Patrick McGloin Board Member
Richard Hill CPA Audit Cmte Chai
Mary Kay Curtiss CPA Treasurer
Haneef Nelson Board President
Robert Braswell Board President
Eric Goldstein Secretary

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
SHELLEY BEST Executive Director 3.3% of Rev
KATE MCOMBER Executive Director 2.4% of Rev
ROBERT BRASWELL Board Member
RICHARD HILL Board Member
MARY KAY CURTISS Board Member
CHRISTOPHER J DELELLO Board Member
JASON GUTCHEON Board Member
STANLEY HARASIMOWITZ Board Member
MELANIE TUCKER Board Member
MICHAEL A PIGNATELLA Board Member
ERIC GOLDSTEIN Board Member
CHIP MCCABE Board Member
T'CHALLA WILLIAMS Board Member
STEPHEN JACKSON BOD TREASURE
JANET LINK BOD SECRETAR
HANEEF NELSON BOD VICE PRE
BRIAN REFICI BOD PRESIDEN

Tax year 2021

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
CATHERINE MALLOY Executive Director 3.3% of Rev
KATE MCOMBER Executive Director 3.2% of Rev
BRETT THOMPSON COO 0.3% of Rev
CAROL GARLICK Board Member
CHRIS MCGOLDRICK Board Member
RICHARD CAPORASO Board Member
CAROL TERRY Board Member
WILLIAM FISH JR Board Member
MARY KAY CURTISS Board Member
CHRISTOPHER J DELELLO Board Member
JASON GUTCHEON Board Member
DONALD SEIFEL JR Board Member
PAT SHIRLEY Board Member
MICHAEL A PIGNATELLA Board Member
ERIC GOLDSTEIN Board Member
JANEE WOODS WEBER Board Member
BRIAN REFICI Board Member
T'CHALLA WILLIAMS Board Member
STEPHEN JACKSON BOD TREASURE
JANET LINK BOD SECRETAR
EMMA LADD BOD 2ND VICE
KEVIN SMITH BOD VICE PRE
PAUL E GUZZARDI BOD PRESIDEN
KAREN EISENBACH Board President
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
0 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
58 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
60 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
35 / 100
Priority Review

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 131 other orgs in CT with NTEE prefix A6.

Most-divergent component: financial score sits 38 points below the peer median (0 vs. 38).

5-year trend: Structural Deficit

Persistently low financial health over 5 years despite strong programmatic output. They are borrowing from their future (or bleeding an endowment) to pay for today's programs.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

The two changes that would most improve this score:

  1. Build cash reserves to at least 3 months of operating expenses — moves financial resilience score meaningfully (~10 points).

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.