Steady State
Steady State
Steady State Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Developing
Trajectory Thumbprint

Steady State

What does this mean?

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

The Path Forward

The Stewardship

Focuses on long-term sustainability and gentle cultivation of existing resources rather than forced expansion. It honors the organization's established role as a reliable anchor.

The Stewardship
The Stewardship
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Steady State ↑
Overall
46
Score
Governance
42
Score
Financial
40
Score
Program
60
Score

Institutional Epochs

2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Steady State

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2023 — — 28.2% 46 Governance-Stressed Gov Risk
2022 — — 20.1% 51 Fragile Recovery
2021 — — 39.0% 36 Fragile Recovery
2020 — — 41.6% 34 Critical Intervention Needed Gov Risk
2019 — — 26.6% 40 Fragile Recovery
2018 — — 32.7% 24 Critical Intervention Needed Recovery
2017 — — 54.9% 21 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2016 — — 58.3% 21 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2015 — — 62.0% 21 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2014 — — 55.1% 21 Critical Intervention Needed Gov Risk
2013 — — 42.8% 22 Critical Intervention Needed Gov Risk
2012 — — 36.4% 28 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2011 — — 39.5% 32 Critical Intervention Needed Gov Risk

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
YEOU-CHENG MA Executive Director 9.9% of Rev
MICHAEL DADAP Artistic Director 9.3% of Rev
CYNTHIA DE LEON Treasurer 7.0% of Rev
FR DAVID LOWRY Board President —
ROLAND SHEN Treasurer —
DANIEL CHANG Board Member —
JUNE FENG Board Member —
JAMIE KIM-ROSS Board Member —
LILY H LI Board Member —
LOIDA NICOLAS-LEWIS Board Member —
LILY O'BOYLE Board Member —
REVELINO PASCUAL Board Member —
DR DANIEL F ROSES Board Member —
HELENE ROSES Board Member —
MATTHEW SULLIVAN Board Member —

Tax year 2022

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
YEOU-CHENG MA Executive Director 9.8% of Rev
MICHAEL DADAP Artistic Director 9.3% of Rev
CYNTHIA DE LEON Treasurer 7.0% of Rev
FR DAVID LOWRY Board President —
ROLAND SHEN Treasurer —
DANIEL CHANG Board Member —
JUNE FENG Board Member —
JAMIE KIM-ROSS Board Member —
LILY H LI Board Member —
LOIDA NICOLAS-LEWIS Board Member —
LILY O'BOYLE Board Member —
REVELINO PASCUAL Board Member —
DR DANIEL F ROSES Board Member —
HELENE ROSES Board Member —
MATTHEW SULLIVAN Board Member —

Tax year 2021

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
MICHAEL DADAP Artistic Director 9.3% of Rev
YEOU-CHENG MA Executive Director 9.3% of Rev
CYNTHIA DE LEON Treasurer 7.0% of Rev
FR DAVID LOWRY Board President —
ROLAND SHEN Treasurer —
DANIEL CHANG Board Member —
JUNE FENG Board Member —
JAMIE KIM-ROSS Board Member —
LILY H LI Board Member —
LOIDA NICOLAS-LEWIS Board Member —
LILY O'BOYLE Board Member —
REVELINO PASCUAL Board Member —
DR DANIEL F ROSES Board Member —
HELENE ROSES Board Member —
MATTHEW SULLIVAN Board Member —
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
40 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
42 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
60 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
46 / 100
Developing

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 1,227 other orgs in NY with NTEE prefix A6.

Most-divergent component: program score sits 31 points above the peer median (60 vs. 29).

5-year trend: Steady State

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

Overall score has gone from 40 → 46 over 5 years (improving by 6 points).

What's driving this score

What would change this score

The two changes that would most improve this score:

  1. Reduce top-officer compensation from 28.2% to under 22% of revenue — would move governance score by ~12 points.
  2. Separate signing authority from fundraising authority when both are held by one person — removes the concentration penalty (~12 points).

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.