Steady State
Steady State
Steady State Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Developing
Trajectory Thumbprint

Steady State

What does this mean?

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

The Path Forward

The Stewardship

Focuses on long-term sustainability and gentle cultivation of existing resources rather than forced expansion. It honors the organization's established role as a reliable anchor.

The Stewardship
The Stewardship
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Steady State
Overall
51
Score
Governance
58
Score
Financial
40
Score
Program
60
Score

Institutional Epochs

2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Steady State

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2023 4.4% 51 Fragile Decline Risk
2022 5.0% 55 Fragile Stable Watch
2021 6.0% 54 Fragile Stable Watch
2020 5.7% 54 Fragile Recovery
2019 5.1% 52 Fragile Recovery
2018 47 Fragile Recovery
2017 29.0% 44 Governance-Stressed Gov Risk
2016 29.1% 44 Governance-Stressed Gov Risk
2015 27.7% 44 Governance-Stressed Gov Risk
2014 6.7% 54 Fragile Stable Watch
2013 6.0% 54 Fragile Recovery
2012 7.7% 50 Fragile Stable Watch
2011 9.4% 50 Fragile Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
IGNACIO BARRON VIELA Executive Director 7.4% of Rev
BOB GRIFFIN Board President
SCOTT BROWN Board President
ELIZABETH GOETZ Treasurer
SUSAN BARROW Secretary
LESLIE BLAIR Board President
MIKE GEURIN Board Member
JEFF LINDENBAUM Board Member
ASHLEY MILLER Board Member
JASE NORSWORTHY Board Member
CHRISTINE MARAGOS Board Member
LYNN MARQUARDT Board Member
MARJORIE FULTON Board Member
MARK RANDAK Board Member
JOSEPH SOUEIDI Board Member
LIZ FULTON Board Member
JULIE JOHNSON Board Member
TRACY MOUSER Board Member
TYLER MENZALES Board Member
MARGIT THORNDAL Board Member
CANDY HOLZER Board Member
DEVIN WERTMAN Board Member
SEPHER ESKANDARI Board Member
TOM HOHN Board Member

Tax year 2022

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
IGNACIO BARRON VIELA Executive Director 6.7% of Rev
ASHLEY MILLER Board Member
JASE NORSWORTHY Board Member
CHRISTINE MARAGOS Board Member
LYNN MARQUARDT Board Member
MARJORIE FULTON Board Member
ROBERT SAUNDERS Board Member
MARK RANDAK Board Member
ABIGAIL RENO Board Member
JOSEPH SOUEIDI Board Member
LIZ FULTON Board Member
ZACHARY MATHES Board Member
JULIE JOHNSON Board Member
TRACY MOUSER Board Member
BOB WILMOUTH Board Member
BOB GRIFFIN Board President
SCOTT BROWN Board President
ELIZABETH GOETZ Treasurer
SUSAN BARROW Secretary
LESLIE BLAIR Board President
PENNY DOAK Board Member
MIKE GEURIN Board Member
JEFF LINDENBAUM Board Member
ANN KOSEMPA Board Member

Tax year 2021

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
IGNACIO BARRON VIELA Executive Director 6.1% of Rev
BOB GRIFFIN Board President
ROBERT QUAM Board President
SCOTT BROWN Treasurer
ELIZABETH GOETZ Treasurer
SUSAN BARROW Secretary
LESLIE BLAIR Board President
PENNY DOAK Board Member
MIKE GEURIN Board Member
JEFF LINDENBAUM Board Member
ANN KOSEMPA Board Member
ROBYN MILLER Board Member
JASE NORSWORTHY Board Member
CHRISTINE MARAGOS Board Member
LYNN MARQUARDT Board Member
MARJORIE FULTON Board Member
ROBERT SAUNDERS Board Member
MARK RANDAK Board Member
ABIGAIL RENO Board Member
JOSEPH SOUEIDI Board Member
LIZ FULTON Board Member
ZACHARY MATHES Board Member
JULIE JOHNSON Board Member
TRACY MOUSER Board Member
BOB WILMOUTH Board Member
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
40 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
58 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
60 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
51 / 100
Developing

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 16 other orgs in MT with NTEE prefix A6.

Most-divergent component: program score sits 21 points above the peer median (60 vs. 39).

5-year trend: Steady State

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

Overall score has gone from 52 → 51 over 5 years (declining by 1 points).

What's driving this score

What would change this score

No specific high-impact levers identified — this org's score is balanced across components.

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.