Steady State
Steady State
Steady State Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Stable
Trajectory Thumbprint

Steady State

What does this mean?

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

The Path Forward

The Stewardship

Focuses on long-term sustainability and gentle cultivation of existing resources rather than forced expansion. It honors the organization's established role as a reliable anchor.

The Stewardship
The Stewardship
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Steady State
Overall
51
Score
Governance
50
Score
Financial
75
Score
Program
15
Score

Institutional Epochs

2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Steady State

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2023 51 Fragile Recovery
2022 41 Fragile Recovery
2021 21.7% 39 Fragile Gov Risk
2020 57 Fragile Recovery
2019 53 Fragile Recovery
2018 49 Fragile Decline Risk
2017 53 Fragile Stable Watch
2016 53 Fragile Stable Watch
2015 53 Fragile Decline Risk
2014 57 Fragile Recovery
2013 47 Fragile Decline Risk
2012 51 Fragile Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
JOSEPH JACOVINO MUSIC DIRECT 3.4% of Rev
ANITA CORBEIL Board President
THOMAS CONROY Secretary
FRED KRUG Board Member
JARED LOOK Board President
KAREN RIGOPULOS Board President
ROBERT FENN Board Member
PAULA GETNICK Board Member
RICHARD HALL Board Member
JOHN MANNING Secretary
MARGRIT MORLEY Board Member
GISELLE SASKOR Board Member
DAVID SCHUSTER Board Member
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
75 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
50 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
15 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
51 / 100
Stable

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 131 other orgs in CT with NTEE prefix A6.

Most-divergent component: financial score sits 37 points above the peer median (75 vs. 38).

5-year trend: Steady State

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

Overall score has gone from 53 → 51 over 5 years (declining by 2 points).

What's driving this score

What would change this score

The two changes that would most improve this score:

  1. Stabilize program expenses or grow earned-income revenue to break the consecutive-deficit pattern (~8 points to financial score).

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.