Governance Lag
Governance Lag
Governance Lag Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Priority Review
Trajectory Thumbprint

Governance Lag

What does this mean?

Revenue and Program Scale spike rapidly, but the Governance Score remains stagnant. The organization has outgrown its founding era but hasn't installed proper oversight.

The Path Forward

The Scaffold

Brings immediate structural maturity. It represents the necessity of outside, independent oversight to manage new scale, breaking the echo chamber of a founding 'friends and family' board.

The Scaffold
The Scaffold
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Governance Lag
Overall
39
Score
Governance
50
Score
Financial
25
Score
Program
45
Score

Institutional Epochs

2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Governance Lag

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2025 Hidden Hidden Unknown
2023 39 Fragile Recovery
2022 33 Critical Intervention Needed Recovery
2021 22 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2020 44 Financially Distressed Recovery
2019 29 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch
2018 25 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2017 33 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2016 49 Fragile Recovery
2015 45 Fragile Decline Risk
2014 49 Fragile Stable Watch
2013 49 Fragile Recovery
2012 45 Fragile Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2026

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
BETHANY CANNER Board Member
DARCI ADAMSON Board Member
ERIC JUSTIS Board Member
SHANNON GROW Treasurer
SARA HEARSEY Board President
SCOTT SANDEMAN Board President

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Scott Corbitt Board Member
Shannon Grow Board Member
Shelly Renzelman Board Member
Lisa Lovelace Squires Board Member
Amber Brotnov Board Member
Amy Baker Stout Board President
Eric Justis Treasurer
Mike Cannon Board President
Gabi Segren Secretary

Tax year 2021

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Amy Canfield Board President
Glory Deniston Treasurer
Vikki Swift-Raymond Board President
Cody Stauffer Secretary
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
25 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
50 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
45 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
39 / 100
Priority Review

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 18 other orgs in ID with NTEE prefix A6.

Most-divergent component: program score sits 11 points above the peer median (45 vs. 34).

5-year trend: Governance Lag

Revenue and Program Scale spike rapidly, but the Governance Score remains stagnant. The organization has outgrown its founding era but hasn't installed proper oversight.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

The two changes that would most improve this score:

  1. Build cash reserves to at least 3 months of operating expenses — moves financial resilience score meaningfully (~10 points).
  2. Stabilize program expenses or grow earned-income revenue to break the consecutive-deficit pattern (~8 points to financial score).

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.