Structural Deficit
Structural Deficit
Structural Deficit Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Priority Review
Trajectory Thumbprint

Structural Deficit

What does this mean?

Persistently low financial health over 5 years despite strong programmatic output. They are borrowing from their future (or bleeding an endowment) to pay for today's programs.

The Path Forward

The Truth-Teller

Forces necessary, painful cuts to preserve the core. It demands that the organization stop borrowing from its future and align its current programmatic output with actual sustainable revenue.

The Truth-Teller
The Truth-Teller
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Structural Deficit
Overall
35
Score
Governance
50
Score
Financial
15
Score
Program
45
Score

Institutional Epochs

2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Structural Deficit

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2024 Hidden Hidden 35 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch
2023 35 Critical Intervention Needed Recovery
2022 28 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2021 34 Critical Intervention Needed Recovery
2020 32 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2019 34 Critical Intervention Needed Recovery
2018 32 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2017 31 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch
2016 31 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2015 38 Financially Distressed Recovery
2014 31 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2013 35 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch
2012 35 Critical Intervention Needed Recovery
2011 31 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
MEGAN SANDONE Secretary
NANCY MAGRATH Board Member
LORA NORDSTROM Board Member
KEN DIEMER Board Member
HEIDI HERBERT-LOVEN Board President
JOHN FRASER Treasurer
LISA GEIST Board Member
TOM HEWITT Board Member
LANA RAMOS Board Member
REBECCA L OBERRECHT Board President
MEGAN SANDONE Secretary
NANCY MAGRATH Board Member
BRIAN BLESSINGTON Treasurer
JENNIFER MIDTHUN JANES Board Member
SHARON HIGGINS Board Member
HEIDI HERBERT-LOVEN Board President
JOHN FRASER Board Member
LISA GEIST Board Member
PAT SMITH Board Member
LANA RAMOS Board Member
REBECCA L OBERRECHT Board President

Tax year 2022

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
MEGAN SANDONE Board Member
NANCY MAGRATH Board President
RENEE DOWNS Secretary
BRIAN BLESSINGTON Treasurer
JENNIFER MIDTHUN JANES Board Member
SHARON HIGGINS Board Member
HEIDI HERBERT-LOVEN Board Member
CATHERINE GAGE Board Member
CARRIE RADER Board Member
CASEY CARRUTH-HINCHEY Board Member
CYNTHIA GEIERMANN Board Member
PAT SMITH Board Member
AGGIE RIVERA Board Member
LANA RAMOS Board Member

Tax year 2021

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
MEGAN SANDONE Board President
NANCY MAGRATH Board President
RENEE DOWNS Secretary
BRIAN BLESSINGTON Treasurer
JENNIFER MIDTHUN JANES Board Member
SHARON HIGGINS Board Member
HEIDI HERBERT-LOVEN Board Member
CATHERINE GAGE Board Member
CARRIE RADER Board Member
CASEY CARRUTH-HINCHEY Board Member
CYNTHIA GEIERMANN Board Member
PAT SMITH Board Member
AGGIE RIVERA Board Member
LANA RAMOS Board Member
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
15 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
50 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
45 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
35 / 100
Priority Review

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 29 other orgs in AK with NTEE prefix A6.

Most-divergent component: financial score sits 19 points below the peer median (15 vs. 34).

5-year trend: Structural Deficit

Persistently low financial health over 5 years despite strong programmatic output. They are borrowing from their future (or bleeding an endowment) to pay for today's programs.

Overall score has gone from 32 → 35 over 5 years (improving by 3 points).

What's driving this score

What would change this score

The two changes that would most improve this score:

  1. Build cash reserves to at least 3 months of operating expenses — moves financial resilience score meaningfully (~10 points).

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.