Governance Lag
Governance Lag
Governance Lag Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Stable
Trajectory Thumbprint

Governance Lag

What does this mean?

Revenue and Program Scale spike rapidly, but the Governance Score remains stagnant. The organization has outgrown its founding era but hasn't installed proper oversight.

The Path Forward

The Scaffold

Brings immediate structural maturity. It represents the necessity of outside, independent oversight to manage new scale, breaking the echo chamber of a founding 'friends and family' board.

The Scaffold
The Scaffold
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Governance Lag ↑
Overall
60
Score
Governance
50
Score
Financial
90
Score
Program
15
Score

Institutional Epochs

2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Governance Lag

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2025 Hidden Hidden — — Unknown —
2024 Hidden Hidden — — Unknown —
2023 — — — 60 Stable Stable Watch
2022 — — — 56 Fragile Recovery
2021 — — — 41 Fragile Decline Risk
2020 — — — 56 Fragile Recovery
2019 — — — 53 Fragile Stable Watch
2018 — — — 53 Fragile Stable Watch
2017 — — — 57 Fragile Decline Risk
2016 — — — 57 Fragile Recovery
2015 — — — 53 Fragile Decline Risk
2014 — — — 57 Fragile Stable Watch
2013 — — — 57 Fragile Stable Watch
2012 — — — 57 Fragile Stable Watch
2011 — — — 57 Fragile Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2025

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
DAVE FLEMING Board Member —
SEAN BUTLER Board Member —
PATRICK DANIEL Board Member —
BRY ZANOTELLI Board Member —
LORI STRAMASKI Board Member —
BARBARA WILLIAMS Board Member —
JENNIFER VERTULLO Board President —
AMY MAJEWSKI Board President —
SIERRA MITCHELL CORPORATE SECRE —
JANET GERBER Treasurer —
HEATHER ATKINSON Board Member —
BECKY ALEXA Board Member —
DOROTHY FALLOWS Board Member —
DAVE FLEMING Board Member —
SEAN BUTLER Board Member —
PATRICK DANIEL Board Member —
BRY ZANOTELLI Board Member —
LORI STRAMASKI Board Member —
BARBARA WILLIAMS Board Member —
JENNIFER VERTULLO Board President —
AMY MAJEWSKI Board President —
SIERRA MITCHELL CORPORATE SECRE —
JANET GERBER Treasurer —
HEATHER ATKINSON Board Member —
BECKY ALEXA Board Member —
DOROTHY FALLOWS Board Member —

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
JENNIFER VERTULLO Board President —
AMY MAJEWSKI Board President —
PHILIP BOATRIGHT Secretary —
JANET GERBER Treasurer —
TOM ARILLOTTA Board Member —
HEATHER ATKINSON Board Member —
EDWARD E BOSTEDO JR Board Member —
DOROTHY FALLOWS Board Member —
DAVE FLEMING Board Member —
KACIE GREENLIEF Board Member —
EDDIE KUNZ Board Member —
SIERRA MITCHELL Board Member —
ANITA SEDLOCK Board Member —
LORI STRAMASKI Board Member —
BARBARA WILLIAMS Board Member —

Tax year 2021

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
DOROTHY FALLOWS Board President —
JENNIFER VERTULLO Board President —
HEATHER ATKINSON Secretary —
JANET GERBER Treasurer —
PHILIP BOATRIGHT Board Member —
EDWARD E BOSTEDO JR Board Member —
JESSICA FREUDEN Board Member —
BILL HOLIDAY Board Member —
TINA HULL Board Member —
DANIEL KIRK Board Member —
AMY MAJEWSKI Board Member —
LORA OXENREITER Board Member —
ANITA SEDLOCK Board Member —
LORI STRAMASKI Board Member —
BARBARA WILLIAMS Board Member —
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
90 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
50 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
15 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
60 / 100
Stable

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 461 other orgs in PA with NTEE prefix A6.

Most-divergent component: financial score sits 37 points above the peer median (90 vs. 53).

5-year trend: Governance Lag

Revenue and Program Scale spike rapidly, but the Governance Score remains stagnant. The organization has outgrown its founding era but hasn't installed proper oversight.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

The two changes that would most improve this score:

  1. Stabilize program expenses or grow earned-income revenue to break the consecutive-deficit pattern (~8 points to financial score).

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.