Steady State
Steady State
Steady State Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Priority Review
Trajectory Thumbprint

Steady State

What does this mean?

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

The Path Forward

The Stewardship

Focuses on long-term sustainability and gentle cultivation of existing resources rather than forced expansion. It honors the organization's established role as a reliable anchor.

The Stewardship
The Stewardship
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Steady State
Overall
43
Score
Governance
50
Score
Financial
55
Score
Program
15
Score

Institutional Epochs

2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Steady State

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2025 Hidden Hidden Unknown
2024 Hidden Hidden Unknown
2023 Hidden Hidden 43 Fragile Decline Risk
2022 48 Fragile Recovery
2020 45 Fragile Recovery
2019 43 Fragile Decline Risk
2013 49 Fragile Recovery
2012 45 Fragile Stable Watch
2011 45 Fragile Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2026

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Daniel Petrovich Board President
Robert Murphy Treasurer
Johnny Bertone Board Member
Darice Hoffmann Secretary
Cheryl Dreas Board President
Michele Cerrone Board Member
Rody Gilkeson Production
Matt Redline Board Member

Tax year 2025

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Alejandro Santos Board President
Maureen Calder Treasurer
Daniel Petrovich Emeritus
Darice Hoffmann Board President
Cheryl Dreas Board President
Michele Cerrone Emeritus

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Alejandro Santos Board President
Melissa Dorflinger Board President
Connie Santos Secretary
Maureen Calder Treasurer
Cindi Greatsinger Board Member
Nate Kuhns Board Member
Krystal Cruz Board Member
Crystal Williams Board Member
Alana McLaughlin Board Member
Andrew Mark Schaffer Board Member
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
55 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
50 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
15 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
43 / 100
Priority Review

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 295 other orgs in PA with NTEE prefix A6.

Most-divergent component: financial score sits 18 points above the peer median (55 vs. 37).

5-year trend: Steady State

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

No specific high-impact levers identified — this org's score is balanced across components.

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.