Institutional Maturation
Institutional Maturation
Institutional Maturation Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Developing
Trajectory Thumbprint

Institutional Maturation

What does this mean?

The gold standard. 10-year slow, steady, concurrent growth across Financial Health, Governance, and Program. Leadership is scaling their oversight and impact in lockstep.

The Path Forward

The Crown

A mandate to lead the sector. It encourages the organization to mentor emerging nonprofits and embark on generational capital projects, leveraging their profound stability.

The Crown
The Crown
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Institutional Maturation
Overall
54
Score
Governance
55
Score
Financial
50
Score
Program
60
Score

Institutional Epochs

2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Institutional Maturation

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2024 Hidden Hidden Unknown
2023 5.5% 54 Fragile Recovery
2022 13.9% 48 Fragile Decline Risk
2021 8.4% 54 Fragile Recovery
2020 23.7% 33 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2019 35 Financially Distressed Recovery
2018 20.4% 33 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2017 39 Financially Distressed Recovery
2016 25.6% 38 Critical Intervention Needed Gov Risk
2015 17.5% 43 Fragile Decline Risk
2014 16.6% 43 Fragile Decline Risk
2013 15.4% 47 Fragile Recovery
2012 10.6% 47 Fragile Recovery
2011 25.2% 40 Fragile Gov Risk

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2025

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
RONALD M CARTER Board President 5.5% of Rev
CHRISTOPHER LEISIE Board President
NEAL JACKSON Treasurer
NICOLE THURNER Secretary
KATHY CARTER Board Member

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
RONALD M CARTER Board President 7.0% of Rev
CHRISTOPHER LEISIE Board President
KATHY CARTER Treasurer
NICOLE THURNER Secretary

Tax year 2021

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
RONALD M CARTER Board President 4.6% of Rev
CHRISTOPHER LEISIE Board President
DANIEL MILLER Secretary
JOANNE TEICHART Board Member
KATHY CARTER Treasurer
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
50 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
55 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
60 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
54 / 100
Developing

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 295 other orgs in PA with NTEE prefix A6.

Most-divergent component: program score sits 28 points above the peer median (60 vs. 32).

5-year trend: Institutional Maturation

The gold standard. 10-year slow, steady, concurrent growth across Financial Health, Governance, and Program. Leadership is scaling their oversight and impact in lockstep.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

No specific high-impact levers identified — this org's score is balanced across components.

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.