Steady State
Steady State
Steady State Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Stable
Trajectory Thumbprint

Steady State

What does this mean?

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

The Path Forward

The Stewardship

Focuses on long-term sustainability and gentle cultivation of existing resources rather than forced expansion. It honors the organization's established role as a reliable anchor.

The Stewardship
The Stewardship
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Steady State
Overall
49
Score
Governance
50
Score
Financial
50
Score
Program
45
Score

Institutional Epochs

2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Steady State

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2023 49 Fragile Recovery
2022 45 Fragile Decline Risk
2021 50 Fragile Recovery
2020 44 Fragile Stable Watch
2019 44 Fragile Recovery
2018 37 Financially Distressed Decline Risk
2017 41 Fragile Stable Watch
2016 41 Fragile Stable Watch
2015 41 Financially Distressed Recovery
2014 27 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2013 39 Financially Distressed Recovery
2012 29 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2011 33 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
JEAN BRYANT AUXILIARY BO
LYNNE O CARVELL Board President
JOYCE MEGGERSON-MOORE Board President
CHRISTOPHER T MOORE AUXILIARY BO
JUDITH ELLEN SAUNDERS Secretary

Tax year 2022

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
JOYCE MEGGERSON MOORE Board President
LYNNE O CARVELL Board President
JUDITH ELLEN SAUNDERS Secretary
JEAN BRYANT AUXILIARY BO
CHRISTOPHER T MOORE AUXILIARY BO

Tax year 2021

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
JOYCE MEGGERSON-MOORE Board President
LYNNE O CARVELL Board President
JUDITH ELLEN SAUNDERS Secretary
JEAN BRYANT AUXILIARY BO
CHRISTOPHER T MOORE AUXILIARY BO
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
50 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
50 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
45 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
49 / 100
Stable

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 295 other orgs in PA with NTEE prefix A6.

Most-divergent component: financial score sits 13 points above the peer median (50 vs. 37).

5-year trend: Steady State

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

Overall score has gone from 44 → 49 over 5 years (improving by 5 points).

What's driving this score

What would change this score

No specific high-impact levers identified — this org's score is balanced across components.

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.