Steady State
Steady State
Steady State Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Developing
Trajectory Thumbprint

Steady State

What does this mean?

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

The Path Forward

The Stewardship

Focuses on long-term sustainability and gentle cultivation of existing resources rather than forced expansion. It honors the organization's established role as a reliable anchor.

The Stewardship
The Stewardship
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Steady State
Overall
47
Score
Governance
58
Score
Financial
30
Score
Program
60
Score

Institutional Epochs

2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Steady State

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2024 Hidden Hidden Unknown
2023 Hidden Hidden 4.9% 47 Financially Distressed Decline Risk
2022 4.5% 47 Financially Distressed Decline Risk
2021 5.8% 50 Fragile Recovery
2020 6.8% 44 Financially Distressed Decline Risk
2019 4.3% 47 Financially Distressed Decline Risk
2018 4.8% 47 Financially Distressed Decline Risk
2017 5.9% 50 Fragile Decline Risk
2016 3.9% 55 Fragile Stable Watch
2015 6.9% 54 Fragile Stable Watch
2014 3.6% 55 Fragile Stable Watch
2013 2.8% 55 Fragile Recovery
2012 6.5% 52 Fragile Decline Risk
2011 4.8% 55 Fragile Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2025

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
JENNIFER CARLSON Executive Director 4.9% of Rev
JOCELYN S HARRIS Board President
SUSAN BERRY-GORELLI Board President
MARYLOUISE STERGE Board President
PAULINE MONSON Secretary
MATTHEW CARBERRY Treasurer
RONALD ARENA Board Member
REBECCA H BRADBEER Board Member
JACQUELINE R D'ERCOLE Board Member
JANICE HARTMANN Board Member
RICHARD A KUNSCH SR Board Member
KENNETH B MUMMA Board Member
MEGAN SUTHERLAND Board Member
WILLIAM M ANDERSEN Board Member
STEPHEN H KALIS Board Member
MARIAN D MOSKOWITZ Board Member
SUZANNE V NORRIS Board Member

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
JANICE HARTMANN Board Member 2.0% of Rev
JENNIFER CARLSON Executive Director 1.9% of Rev
SUZANNE V NORRIS Board President
WILLIAM M ANDERSEN Board President
STEPHEN H KALIS Secretary
MATTHEW CARBERRY Treasurer
RONALD ARENA Board Member
SUSAN BERRY-GORELLI Board Member
REBECCA H BRADBEER Board Member
JOCELYN S HARRIS Board Member
TRISH HARTLINE Board Member
RICHARD A KUNSCH SR Board Member
PAULINE MONSON Board Member
MARIAN D MOSKOWITZ Board Member
KENNETH MUMMA Board Member
MARYLOUISE STERGE Board Member

Tax year 2022

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
KEN METZNER Executive Director 3.8% of Rev
SUZANNE V NORRIS Board President
WILLIAM M ANDERSEN Board President
STEPHEN H KALIS Secretary
JANICE HARTMANN Treasurer
MARIAN D MOSKOWITZ Board President
RONALD ARENA Board Member
SUSAN BERRY-GORELLI Board Member
REBECCA H BRADBEER Board Member
MATTHEW CARBERRY Treasurer
JOCELYN S HARRIS Board Member
TRISH HARTLINE Board Member
RICHARD A KUNSCH SR Board Member
PAULINE MONSON Board Member
KENNETH MUMMA Board Member
MARYLOUISE STERGE Board Member

Tax year 2021

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
KEN METZNER Executive Director 3.8% of Rev
MARIAN D MOSKOWITZ Board President
WILLIAM M ANDERSEN Board President
STEPHEN H KALIS Secretary
JANICE HARTMANN Treasurer
SUZANNE V NORRIS Board Member
RONALD ARENA Board Member
SUSAN BERRY-GORELLI Board Member
REBECCA H BRADBEER Board Member
MATTHEW CARBERRY Board Member
JOCELYN S HARRIS Board Member
TRISH HARTLINE Board Member
RICHARD A KUNSCH SR Board Member
PAULINE MONSON Board Member
KENNETH MUMMA Board Member
MARYLOUISE STERGE Board Member
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
30 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
58 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
60 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
47 / 100
Developing

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 295 other orgs in PA with NTEE prefix A6.

Most-divergent component: program score sits 28 points above the peer median (60 vs. 32).

5-year trend: Steady State

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

The two changes that would most improve this score:

  1. Build cash reserves to at least 3 months of operating expenses — moves financial resilience score meaningfully (~10 points).

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.