Structural Deficit
Structural Deficit
Structural Deficit Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Priority Review
Trajectory Thumbprint

Structural Deficit

What does this mean?

Persistently low financial health over 5 years despite strong programmatic output. They are borrowing from their future (or bleeding an endowment) to pay for today's programs.

The Path Forward

The Truth-Teller

Forces necessary, painful cuts to preserve the core. It demands that the organization stop borrowing from its future and align its current programmatic output with actual sustainable revenue.

The Truth-Teller
The Truth-Teller
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Structural Deficit
Overall
34
Score
Governance
50
Score
Financial
5
Score
Program
45
Score

Institutional Epochs

2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Structural Deficit

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2025 Hidden Hidden Unknown
2024 Hidden Hidden Unknown
2023 34 Critical Intervention Needed Recovery
2022 31 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2021 40 Fragile Recovery
2020 32 Critical Intervention Needed Recovery
2019 37.4% 26 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch
2018 29 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch
2017 29 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch
2016 29 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2015 31 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch
2014 31 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2013 39 Financially Distressed Decline Risk
2012 37 Financially Distressed Recovery
2011 33 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2026

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
PETER HAAS Board President
JEFFREY CARSON Board Member
CHRISTOPHER COLEMAN Board Member
DAN SLOANE Board Member
STEVE DEXTER Board Member
CALEB TRACEY Board Member
MATTHEW PALMER Board Member
LUIS MARRERO Board Member
STEVE QUINN Board Member
PETER HAAS Board President
VAUGHN BRWON Board Member
JEFFREY CARSON Board Member
DAVID BRONSTEIN Board Member
STEVE DEXTER Board Member
BERT DIZON Board Member
DOUG WALTER Board Member
JOHN HAIR Board Member
LUIS MARRERO Board Member
OWEN SACCO Board Member
ROBERT D'ERRICO Board Member
DOMINIC SPADACCINI Board Member

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
ONTE MCCLENDON Board President
STEVE DEXTER VICE PRESIDE
DEREK JONES Treasurer
CALEB TRACY Board Member
MICHAEL BRANTLEY Board Member
JOSEPH BUCHES Board Member
TONI WILLIAMSON Board Member

Tax year 2021

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
DAVID BIELENBERG Board Member 24.5% of Rev
JOSEPH J BUCHES Board Member 22.1% of Rev
DEREK JONES Board Member
CHRISTOPHER PINTO Board Member
ALEXANDER RIOH Board Member
MATTHEW SIMMERS Board Member
TONI WILLIAMSON Board Member
ONTE MCCLENDON Board President
CHRISTOPHER PINTO VICE PRESIDE
SHYAM OZA Treasurer
ALEXANDER RIOH Secretary
MICHAEL BRANTLEY Board Member
DUSTIN CATES Board Member
BRIAN CHAFFINCH Board Member
JOSHUA JOHNSON Board Member
DEREK JONES Board Member
LELAND KIMBAL Board Member
MARK SCHRADER Board Member
JOHN-PAUL VERMITSKY Board Member
TONI WILLIAMSON Board Member
ANASTASIA ZUCCARO Board President
ONTE MCCLENDON VICE PRESIDE
JOHN-PAUL VERMITSKY Treasurer
ERIC GUTSHALL Secretary
MICHAEL BRANTLEY Board Member
DUSTIN CATES Board Member
BRIAN CHAFFINCH Board Member
CHRIS COLEMAN Board Member
JOE EHRMAN-DUPRE Board Member
JOSHUA JOHNSON Board Member
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
5 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
50 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
45 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
34 / 100
Priority Review

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 295 other orgs in PA with NTEE prefix A6.

Most-divergent component: financial score sits 33 points below the peer median (5 vs. 38).

5-year trend: Structural Deficit

Persistently low financial health over 5 years despite strong programmatic output. They are borrowing from their future (or bleeding an endowment) to pay for today's programs.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

The two changes that would most improve this score:

  1. Build cash reserves to at least 3 months of operating expenses — moves financial resilience score meaningfully (~10 points).

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.