Steady State
What does this mean?
No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.
The Path Forward
The Stewardship
Focuses on long-term sustainability and gentle cultivation of existing resources rather than forced expansion. It honors the organization's established role as a reliable anchor.
Institutional Epochs
Historical Performance
| Year | Revenue | Top Comp | Comp % Rev | Score | Phase Label | Outlook | Details |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | Hidden | Hidden | — | — | Unknown | — | |
| 2023 | — | — | 58.1% | 34 | Critical Intervention Needed | Recovery | |
| 2021 | — | — | — | 33 | Critical Intervention Needed | Decline Risk | |
| 2020 | — | — | — | 47 | Fragile | Recovery | |
| 2019 | — | — | — | 41 | Fragile | Decline Risk | |
| 2018 | — | — | — | 47 | Fragile | Recovery | |
| 2017 | — | — | — | 35 | Critical Intervention Needed | Decline Risk | |
| 2016 | — | — | — | 41 | Fragile | Decline Risk | |
| 2015 | — | — | — | 47 | Fragile | Recovery | |
| 2014 | — | — | — | 37 | Financially Distressed | Recovery | |
| 2013 | — | — | — | 33 | Critical Intervention Needed | Decline Risk | |
| 2012 | — | — | — | 35 | Critical Intervention Needed | Decline Risk | |
| 2011 | — | — | — | 39 | Fragile | Stable Watch |
Officer compensation history
Tax year 2025
| Name | Title | Phone | Compensation | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| GARY GARLETTS | Artistic Director | 30.3% of Rev | ||
| ANN MARIE ELLIS | ACCOMPIANIST | 19.7% of Rev | ||
| PATRICIA MANCUSO | Board Member | 7.0% of Rev | ||
| ANTHONY MANCUSO | WEBMASTER | 1.0% of Rev | ||
| SUSAN VISOKAS | Board President | — | ||
| JESSICA YOTHERS | Treasurer | — |
Tax year 2023
| Name | Title | Phone | Compensation | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gary Garletts | Artistic Director | 29.8% of Rev | ||
| Ann Ellis | Accompianist | 19.5% of Rev | ||
| John Banionis | Board President | — | ||
| Sue Sutter | Secretary | — | ||
| Barbara McIntosh | Treasurer | — | ||
| Amedeo Piccioni | Comptroller | — |
Score breakdown
The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →
Peer comparison
Compared to 296 other orgs in PA with NTEE prefix A6.
Most-divergent component: program score sits 17 points below the peer median (15 vs. 32).
5-year trend: Steady State
No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.
What's driving this score
- Comp-to-revenue ratio of 58.1% is well above the sector's 90th percentile (healthy band: 18–22%).
What would change this score
The two changes that would most improve this score:
- Reduce top-officer compensation from 58.1% to under 22% of revenue — would move governance score by ~40 points.
- Separate signing authority from fundraising authority when both are held by one person — removes the concentration penalty (~12 points).
Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.