Structural Deficit
Structural Deficit
Structural Deficit Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Priority Review
Trajectory Thumbprint

Structural Deficit

What does this mean?

Persistently low financial health over 5 years despite strong programmatic output. They are borrowing from their future (or bleeding an endowment) to pay for today's programs.

The Path Forward

The Truth-Teller

Forces necessary, painful cuts to preserve the core. It demands that the organization stop borrowing from its future and align its current programmatic output with actual sustainable revenue.

The Truth-Teller
The Truth-Teller
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Structural Deficit
Overall
37
Score
Governance
58
Score
Financial
5
Score
Program
60
Score

Institutional Epochs

2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Structural Deficit

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2024 Hidden Hidden Unknown
2023 Hidden Hidden 4.3% 37 Financially Distressed Recovery
2022 Hidden Hidden 8.6% 34 Critical Intervention Needed Recovery
2021 13.0% 29 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch
2020 12.2% 32 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch
2019 9.9% 34 Critical Intervention Needed Recovery
2018 32 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch
2017 32 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch
2016 32 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2015 34 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch
2014 34 Critical Intervention Needed Recovery
2013 32 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch
2012 32 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch
2011 32 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2025

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
KEN KAISSAR Board Member 2.1% of Rev
AMY KAISSAR Board Member 2.1% of Rev
JILL COHEN Board Member
RYAN GORDAN Board Member
MEGAN HECKERMAN Board Member
JOHN JORDAN Board Member
BARBARA MCCULLOH Board Member
SUSAN ROSNER Board Member
KIM SOLIS Board Member
VICTORIA RAE SOOK Board Member
KEITH SPENCER Board President
PHILIP FREIDENREICH PHD Board President
ZACHARY BREIDENBACK Secretary
RICHARD SICHEL Treasurer
SUSAN D ATKINSON Board Member

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
KEN KAISSAR Board Member 1.6% of Rev
AMY KAISSAR Board Member 1.6% of Rev
DAVID ABERS GENERAL MANAGER (THRU 9/30/22) 1.0% of Rev
KEITH SPENCER Board President
MANDEE HAMMERSTEIN Board President
PHILIP FREIDENREICH PHD Treasurer
VICTORIA RAE SOOK SECRETARTY
JOSEPH SANGINITI CHAIRMAN
SUSAN D ATKINSON Board Member
JILL COHEN Board Member
HENRY CRAWFORD Board Member
RALPH DIGUISEPPE III Board Member
TAMMY ELFORT Board Member
JOHN HILL Board Member
BARBARA MCCULLOH Board Member
RICHARD SICHEL Board Member

Tax year 2022

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
AMY KAISSAR Board Member 2.1% of Rev
KEN KAISSAR Board Member 2.1% of Rev
DAVID ABERS GENERAL MANAGER 1.3% of Rev
CAROL MIGNONI FERGUSON Board President
SUSAN D ATKINSON FOUNDERTRUSTEE
PHILIP FREIDENREICH Secretary
HANK CRAWFORD Board Member
TAMMY ELFORT Board Member
KEITH SPENCER Board President
RICHARD SICHEL Treasurer
JILL COHEN Board Member
JOHN B MEANS CHAIRMAN EMERITUS
WILLIAM SALERNO CHAIRMAN
JOSEPH SANGINITI Board President
JOHN HILL Board Member
MANDEE K HAMMERSTEIN Board Member
BARBARA MCCULLOH Board Member
VICTORIA RAE SOOK Board Member

Tax year 2021

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
KEITH BAKER Artistic Director 2.1% of Rev
SUSAN D ATKINSON Board Member 1.6% of Rev
DAVID ABERS GENERAL MANAGER 1.2% of Rev
AMY KAISSAR Board Member 0.6% of Rev
KEN KAISSAR Board Member 0.6% of Rev
MANDEE L HAMMERSTEIN Board Member
BARBARA MCCULLOH Board Member
VICTORIA RAE SOOK Board Member
JOSEPH SANGINITI Board President
JOHN B MEANS CHAIRMAN EMERITUS
HENRY CRAWFORD Board Member
RICHARD SICHEL Treasurer
WILLIAM SALERNO CHAIRMAN OF THE BOARD
PHILIP FREIDENREICH Secretary
JOHN HILL Board Member
KEITH SPENCER Board President
JILL COHEN Board Member
TAMMY ELFORT Board Member
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
5 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
58 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
60 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
37 / 100
Priority Review

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 295 other orgs in PA with NTEE prefix A6.

Most-divergent component: financial score sits 33 points below the peer median (5 vs. 38).

5-year trend: Structural Deficit

Persistently low financial health over 5 years despite strong programmatic output. They are borrowing from their future (or bleeding an endowment) to pay for today's programs.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

The two changes that would most improve this score:

  1. Build cash reserves to at least 3 months of operating expenses — moves financial resilience score meaningfully (~10 points).
  2. Stabilize program expenses or grow earned-income revenue to break the consecutive-deficit pattern (~8 points to financial score).

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.