Steady State
Steady State
Steady State Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Developing
Trajectory Thumbprint

Steady State

What does this mean?

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

The Path Forward

The Stewardship

Focuses on long-term sustainability and gentle cultivation of existing resources rather than forced expansion. It honors the organization's established role as a reliable anchor.

The Stewardship
The Stewardship
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Steady State ↓
Overall
45
Score
Governance
45
Score
Financial
55
Score
Program
30
Score

Institutional Epochs

2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Steady State

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2024 Hidden Hidden — — Unknown —
2023 Hidden Hidden 24.9% 45 Fragile Recovery
2022 — — — 37 Financially Distressed Recovery
2021 — — 23.9% 39 Fragile Gov Risk
2020 — — 672.6% 38 Governance-Stressed Gov Risk
2019 — — — 47 Fragile Recovery
2018 — — — 45 Fragile Decline Risk
2017 — — — 47 Fragile Stable Watch
2016 — — — 43 Fragile Stable Watch
2015 — — — 43 Fragile Decline Risk
2014 — — — 47 Fragile Recovery
2013 — — — 43 Fragile Recovery
2012 — — — 37 Financially Distressed Decline Risk
2011 — — — 47 Fragile Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2025

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Peter Winter Lee Executive Director 24.9% of Rev
Steven Wennberg Board President —
Ezra Match Board President —
Terry Bachmann Board President —
Thomas Imholte Treasurer —
Zita Angelo Board Member —
Susan Craley Board Member —
William Gulvin Board Member —
Frederick Heagy Board Member —
Randall Heisley-Cato Board Member —
Karen Hostetter Board Member —
Eric Imfof Board Member —
Bruce Kolka Board Member —
Mary-Grace Autumn Lee Board Member —
Sara Willard Lee Board Member —
Devin Rice Board Member —
Nancy Sherer Board Member —
Eryn Spangler Board Member —
Bradley Weirich Board Member —

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Jessica Hayden Executive Director 23.4% of Rev
Steven Wennberg Board President —
Frederick Heagy Board President —
Krista Myers Board President —
Sharon Sacks Treasurer —
Devin Rice Secretary —
Zita Angelo Board Member —
Terry Bachmann Board Member —
Kathleen Fries Board Member —
William Gulvin Board Member —
Randy Heisley-Cato Board Member —
Karen Hostetter Board Member —
Eric Imhof Board Member —
Bruce Kolka Board Member —
Mary-Grace Lee Board Member —
Peter Winter Lee Executive Director —
Sara Willard Lee Board Member —
Ezra Match Board Member —
Rachita Menon Board Member —
Autumn Moore Board Member —
Nancy Sherer Board Member —
Eryn Spangler Board Member —
Brad Weirich Board Member —

Tax year 2022

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Jessica Hayden Executive Director 21.5% of Rev
Steven Wennberg Board President —
Frederick Heagy Board President —
Krista Myers Board President —
Sharon Sacks Treasurer —
Devin Rice Secretary —
Zita Angelo Board Member —
Terry Bachmann Board Member —
Kathy Fries Board Member —
William Gulvin Board Member —
Randall Heisley-Cato Board Member —
Bruce Kolka Board Member —
Mary-Grace Lee Board Member —
Peter Winter Lee Board Member —
Sara Willard Lee Board Member —
Autumn Moore Board Member —
James Richardson Board Member —
Nancy Sherer Board Member —
Eryn Spangler Board Member —
Brad Weirich Board Member —
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
55 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
45 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
30 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
45 / 100
Developing

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 462 other orgs in PA with NTEE prefix A6.

Most-divergent component: governance score sits 18 points below the peer median (45 vs. 63).

5-year trend: Steady State

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

The two changes that would most improve this score:

  1. Separate signing authority from fundraising authority when both are held by one person — removes the concentration penalty (~12 points).
  2. Reduce top-officer compensation from 24.9% to under 22% of revenue — would move governance score by ~6 points.

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.