Compensation Escalation Cycle
Compensation Escalation Cycle
Compensation Escalation Cycle Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Priority Review
Trajectory Thumbprint

Compensation Escalation Cycle

What does this mean?

Revenue grows modestly, but top officer compensation grows consistently for 5 years, breaching danger zones. The executive is negotiating aggressive raises against a compliant board.

The Path Forward

The Steward

Re-establishes board supremacy over executive extraction. It freezes compensation and mandates that all future financial rewards be tied strictly to verifiable mission expansion.

The Steward
The Steward
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Compensation Escalation Cycle ↑
Overall
43
Score
Governance
45
Score
Financial
40
Score
Program
45
Score

Institutional Epochs

2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Compensation Escalation

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2024 Hidden Hidden — — Unknown —
2023 Hidden Hidden 20.1% 43 Fragile Recovery
2022 — — 20.4% 29 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2021 — — 23.1% 43 Fragile Recovery
2020 — — 18.7% 37 Fragile Recovery
2019 — — 14.5% 33 Critical Intervention Needed Recovery
2018 — — 25.3% 30 Critical Intervention Needed Gov Risk
2017 — — 22.2% 31 Critical Intervention Needed Recovery
2016 — — 21.2% 34 Critical Intervention Needed Recovery
2015 — — 27.9% 27 Critical Intervention Needed Gov Risk
2014 — — 24.4% 37 Fragile Recovery
2013 — — 14.4% 31 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch
2012 — — — 27 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch
2011 — — — 27 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2025

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
THOMAS LLOYD Board Member 13.1% of Rev
Thomas Lloyd Ex Officio 13.1% of Rev
SUSAN JOHNSON Asst. Conductor 4.0% of Rev
Susan Johnson Ex Officio 4.0% of Rev
MICHELLE MUELLER Ex Officio 3.1% of Rev
Michelle Mueller Ex Officio 3.1% of Rev
AMY SCHMIDT Board President —
SUSAN MCDONNELL Board President —
JANE KAMP Singer —
AMY OLIVER Singer —
COLIN JENEI Community —
CHAUNCE MONTA Secretary —
SUSAN SCOTT Singer —
SKYE COOPER RAINEY Singer —
RACHEL SANDERS Board President —
MARY MUTH Board President —
Rachel Sanders Board President —
Susannah Roberts Board President —
Kay Rozolis Treasurer —
Chaunce Monta Secretary —
Susan Bindig Singer —
Amy Hammerschmidt Oliver Singer —
Jane Kamp Singer —
Claire Ma Singer —
Susan McDonnell Singer —
Mary Muth Singer —

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
THOMAS LLOYD Board Member 13.4% of Rev
AMY PERRY Board Member —
SUSAN MCDONNELL Board President —
ELIZABETH CLARK Board Member —
JEFF FULGHAM Chairman —
COLIN JENEL Board Member —
CHAUNCE MONTA Secretary —
MARY MUTH Board President —
ALLEN REGAN Board Member —
RACHEL SANDERS Board Member —
CHRISTOPHER K WHITNEY Board Member —
AMY SCHMIDT Board President —

Tax year 2022

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
THOMAS LLOYD Board Member 11.3% of Rev
MICHELLE MUELLER Board Member 2.8% of Rev
JAY BRODISH Treasurer —
BOB VERNON Board Member —
ELIZABETH CLARK Board Member —
JEFF FULGHAM Chairman —
COLIN JENEL Board Member —
CHAUNCE MONTA Secretary —
AMY PERRY Board Member —
MARY MUTH Board President —
ALLEN REGAN Board Member —
RACHEL SANDERS Board Member —
CHRISTOPHER K WHITNEY Board Member —

Tax year 2021

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
THOMAS LLOYD Board Member 10.5% of Rev
MICHAEL MUELLER Board Member 2.8% of Rev
BONNIE BERKMEIER Board Member —
LAURA BIERSMITH Board Member —
ELIZABETH CLARK Treasurer —
JEFF FULGHAM CHAIRMAN —
COLLIN JENEI Board Member —
CHAUNCE MONTA Secretary —
MILO MORRIS Board Member —
MARY MUTH Board President —
ALLEN REGAN Board Member —
RACHEL SANDERS Board Member —
BOB VERNON Board Member —
CHRISTOPHER K WHITNEY Board Member —
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
40 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
45 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
45 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
43 / 100
Priority Review

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 461 other orgs in PA with NTEE prefix A6.

Most-divergent component: governance score sits 18 points below the peer median (45 vs. 63).

5-year trend: Compensation Escalation Cycle

Revenue grows modestly, but top officer compensation grows consistently for 5 years, breaching danger zones. The executive is negotiating aggressive raises against a compliant board.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

The two changes that would most improve this score:

  1. Separate signing authority from fundraising authority when both are held by one person — removes the concentration penalty (~12 points).

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.