Mission Drift
Mission Drift
Mission Drift Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Priority Review
Trajectory Thumbprint

Mission Drift

What does this mean?

Highly volatile revenue swings year over year paired with fluctuating Program Scores. The organization is constantly pivoting to chase restricted grant funding rather than building a sustainable core.

The Path Forward

The Lodestar

A radical recommitment to the core mission. It requires the organization to gain the strength to say 'no' to restricted funding that pulls them away from their true purpose.

The Lodestar
The Lodestar
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Mission Drift ↑
Overall
45
Score
Governance
55
Score
Financial
40
Score
Program
45
Score

Institutional Epochs

2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Mission Drift

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2025 Hidden Hidden — — Unknown —
2024 Hidden Hidden — — Unknown —
2023 Hidden Hidden 7.9% 45 Fragile Recovery
2022 — — — 62 Fragile Recovery
2021 — — 40.8% 37 Governance-Stressed Recovery
2020 — — 9.7% 45 Fragile Recovery
2019 — — 7.0% 39 Fragile Stable Watch
2018 — — 6.2% 39 Fragile Recovery
2017 — — 6.7% 36 Financially Distressed Recovery
2016 — — — 39 Fragile Stable Watch
2015 — — — 39 Fragile Stable Watch
2014 — — — 35 Fragile Recovery
2013 — — — 31 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch
2012 — — — 31 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch
2011 — — 2.7% 34 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2025

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
SUSAN CORT EXECUTIVE DI 8.8% of Rev
SUSAN CORT EXECUTIVE DI 7.9% of Rev
BRENT FISHER Board Member —
ANN KIRBY Board Member —
VIRGINIA LOWE Board Member —
JOE MARCHESE Board Member —
SUSAN MAYERNICK Board Member —
FRANK RAPISARDA Board Member —
JONATHAN REHRER Board Member —
CAROLYN SMITH Board Member —
MICHELE SZKOLNICKI Board Member —
CHRIS BRADLEY Secretary —
SUSAN HOFFMAN Board President —
CHRISTINA LACEY Secretary —
SUE PAVELIC Treasurer —
JORDAN YEAGLEY Board President —
RUTH BARLEY Board Member —
CHRIS BRADLEY Board Member —
PAUL BRETTSCHNEIDER Board Member —
VIRGINIA LOWE Board Member —
PIRO RJEPAJ Board Member —
GENEVA SHEFFER Board Member —
CAROLYN SMITH Board Member —
ERICA WESSLING Board Member —
SUSAN HOFFMAN Board President —
CHRISTINA LACEY Secretary —
SUE PAVELIC Treasurer —
JORDAN YEAGLEY Board President —

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
PAUL METZGER EXECUTIVE DI 10.6% of Rev
JEAN HOFFMAN Board Member —
SUSIE HOFFMAN Board Member —
TIFFANY YANNELLI Board President —
CHRISTINA LACEY Board Member —
RUTH BARLEY Board Member —
TERRI DIBACCO Secretary —
PAUL BRETTSCHNEIDER Board Member —
JORDAN YEAGLEY Board Member —
PIRO RJEPAJ Board Member —
ANN OUYANG Board President —
SUE PAVELIC Treasurer —
ERICA WESSLING Board Member —
CHRIS BRADLEY Board Member —
CAROLYN SMITH Board Member —
GENEVA ROWADER Board Member —
VIRGINIA LOWE Board Member —

Tax year 2022

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
PAUL METZGER EXECUTIVE DI 8.8% of Rev
JEAN HOFFMAN Board Member —
SUSIE HOFFMAN Board Member —
TIFFANY YANNELLI Board President —
CHRISTINA LACEY Board Member —
RUTH BARLEY Board Member —
TERRI DIBACCO Secretary —
PAUL BRETTSCHNEIDER Board Member —
NATE MISCANNON Board Member —
PIRO RJEPAJ Board Member —
ANN OUYANG Board President —
SUE PAVELIC Treasurer —

Tax year 2021

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
PAUL METZGER EXECUTIVE DI 8.8% of Rev
RUTH BARLEY Board Member —
PAUL BRETTSCHNEIDER Board Member —
JEAN HOFFMAN Board Member —
SUSIE HOFFMAN Board Member —
CHRISTINA LACEY Board Member —
NATE MISCANNON Board Member —
PIRO RJEPAJ Board Member —
TERRI DIBACCO Secretary —
ANN OUYANG Board President —
SUE PAVELIC Treasurer —
TIFFANY YANNELLI Board President —
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
40 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
55 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
45 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
45 / 100
Priority Review

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 461 other orgs in PA with NTEE prefix A6.

Most-divergent component: financial score sits 13 points below the peer median (40 vs. 53).

5-year trend: Mission Drift

Highly volatile revenue swings year over year paired with fluctuating Program Scores. The organization is constantly pivoting to chase restricted grant funding rather than building a sustainable core.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

No specific high-impact levers identified — this org's score is balanced across components.

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.