Mission Drift
Mission Drift
Mission Drift Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Priority Review
Trajectory Thumbprint

Mission Drift

What does this mean?

Highly volatile revenue swings year over year paired with fluctuating Program Scores. The organization is constantly pivoting to chase restricted grant funding rather than building a sustainable core.

The Path Forward

The Lodestar

A radical recommitment to the core mission. It requires the organization to gain the strength to say 'no' to restricted funding that pulls them away from their true purpose.

The Lodestar
The Lodestar
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Mission Drift
Overall
45
Score
Governance
55
Score
Financial
40
Score
Program
45
Score

Institutional Epochs

2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Mission Drift

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2025 Hidden Hidden Unknown
2024 Hidden Hidden Unknown
2023 Hidden Hidden 7.9% 45 Fragile Recovery
2022 62 Fragile Recovery
2021 40.8% 37 Governance-Stressed Recovery
2020 9.7% 45 Fragile Recovery
2019 7.0% 39 Fragile Stable Watch
2018 6.2% 39 Fragile Recovery
2017 6.7% 36 Financially Distressed Recovery
2016 39 Fragile Stable Watch
2015 39 Fragile Stable Watch
2014 35 Fragile Recovery
2013 31 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch
2012 31 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch
2011 2.7% 34 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2025

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
SUSAN CORT EXECUTIVE DI 8.8% of Rev
SUSAN CORT EXECUTIVE DI 7.9% of Rev
BRENT FISHER Board Member
ANN KIRBY Board Member
VIRGINIA LOWE Board Member
JOE MARCHESE Board Member
SUSAN MAYERNICK Board Member
FRANK RAPISARDA Board Member
JONATHAN REHRER Board Member
CAROLYN SMITH Board Member
MICHELE SZKOLNICKI Board Member
CHRIS BRADLEY Secretary
SUSAN HOFFMAN Board President
CHRISTINA LACEY Secretary
SUE PAVELIC Treasurer
JORDAN YEAGLEY Board President
RUTH BARLEY Board Member
CHRIS BRADLEY Board Member
PAUL BRETTSCHNEIDER Board Member
VIRGINIA LOWE Board Member
PIRO RJEPAJ Board Member
GENEVA SHEFFER Board Member
CAROLYN SMITH Board Member
ERICA WESSLING Board Member
SUSAN HOFFMAN Board President
CHRISTINA LACEY Secretary
SUE PAVELIC Treasurer
JORDAN YEAGLEY Board President

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
PAUL METZGER EXECUTIVE DI 10.6% of Rev
JEAN HOFFMAN Board Member
SUSIE HOFFMAN Board Member
TIFFANY YANNELLI Board President
CHRISTINA LACEY Board Member
RUTH BARLEY Board Member
TERRI DIBACCO Secretary
PAUL BRETTSCHNEIDER Board Member
JORDAN YEAGLEY Board Member
PIRO RJEPAJ Board Member
ANN OUYANG Board President
SUE PAVELIC Treasurer
ERICA WESSLING Board Member
CHRIS BRADLEY Board Member
CAROLYN SMITH Board Member
GENEVA ROWADER Board Member
VIRGINIA LOWE Board Member

Tax year 2022

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
PAUL METZGER EXECUTIVE DI 8.8% of Rev
JEAN HOFFMAN Board Member
SUSIE HOFFMAN Board Member
TIFFANY YANNELLI Board President
CHRISTINA LACEY Board Member
RUTH BARLEY Board Member
TERRI DIBACCO Secretary
PAUL BRETTSCHNEIDER Board Member
NATE MISCANNON Board Member
PIRO RJEPAJ Board Member
ANN OUYANG Board President
SUE PAVELIC Treasurer

Tax year 2021

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
PAUL METZGER EXECUTIVE DI 8.8% of Rev
RUTH BARLEY Board Member
PAUL BRETTSCHNEIDER Board Member
JEAN HOFFMAN Board Member
SUSIE HOFFMAN Board Member
CHRISTINA LACEY Board Member
NATE MISCANNON Board Member
PIRO RJEPAJ Board Member
TERRI DIBACCO Secretary
ANN OUYANG Board President
SUE PAVELIC Treasurer
TIFFANY YANNELLI Board President
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
40 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
55 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
45 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
45 / 100
Priority Review

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 295 other orgs in PA with NTEE prefix A6.

Most-divergent component: program score sits 13 points above the peer median (45 vs. 32).

5-year trend: Mission Drift

Highly volatile revenue swings year over year paired with fluctuating Program Scores. The organization is constantly pivoting to chase restricted grant funding rather than building a sustainable core.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

No specific high-impact levers identified — this org's score is balanced across components.

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.