Steady State
Steady State
Steady State Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Developing
Trajectory Thumbprint

Steady State

What does this mean?

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

The Path Forward

The Stewardship

Focuses on long-term sustainability and gentle cultivation of existing resources rather than forced expansion. It honors the organization's established role as a reliable anchor.

The Stewardship
The Stewardship
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Steady State ↑
Overall
45
Score
Governance
45
Score
Financial
55
Score
Program
30
Score

Institutional Epochs

2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Steady State

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2025 Hidden Hidden — — Unknown —
2024 — — 16.5% 45 Fragile Recovery
2023 — — — 39 Fragile Recovery
2022 — — 40.7% 36 Governance-Stressed Gov Risk
2021 — — 41.2% 44 Governance-Stressed Recovery
2020 — — 38.9% 34 Critical Intervention Needed Gov Risk
2019 — — — 45 Fragile Stable Watch
2018 — — — 45 Fragile Stable Watch
2017 — — — 45 Fragile Stable Watch
2016 — — — 45 Fragile Stable Watch
2015 — — — 41 Fragile Stable Watch
2014 — — — 41 Fragile Stable Watch
2013 — — — 41 Fragile Recovery
2012 — — — 33 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2025

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
SUSAN COUGHLIN EXECUTIVE DI 16.5% of Rev
ROBERT LESNEFSKY Board President —
JUDITHANNE LOOSE Board President —
EILEEN FISHER Secretary —
MICHELLE HUGHES Treasurer —
CATHY KREITZ-KIRN Board President —
NIKKI DI FABRIZIO Board Member —
ANGELA DOWD Board Member —
DAVID DUQUETTE Board Member —
JULIE JOHNSON Board Member —
SUSAN JOHNSON Board Member —
JORDAN KOURY Board Member —
JOY LOTT Board Member —
LAURA MYERS Board Member —

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
SUSAN COUGHLIN EXECUTIVE DI 15.9% of Rev
GRAHAM BIER MUSIC DIRECT 13.8% of Rev
ERIN BENN Board Member —
NIKKI DIFABRIZIO Board Member —
ANGELA DOWD Board Member —
DAVID DUQUETTE Board Member —
JORDAN KOURY Board Member —
JOY LOTT Board Member —
SHARON LUYBEN Board Member —
ERIN MARTIN Board Member —
ROBERT LESNEFSKY INTERIM CHAI —
CATHY KREITZ-KIRN Board President —
JUDITHANNE LOOSE Board Member —
EILEEN FISHER Board Member —
RUTH MOORE Treasurer —

Tax year 2022

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
SUSAN COUGHLIN EXECUTIVE DI 15.3% of Rev
GRAHAM BIER MUSIC DIRECT 13.4% of Rev
ROBERT LESNEFSKY Board President —
CATHY KREITZ-KIRN BOARD VICE C —
DONALD EDINGER Secretary —
RUTH MOORE Treasurer —
SHARON LUYBEN Board Member —
JASON BROCIOUS Board Member —
DAVID DUQUETTE Board Member —
JUDITHANNE LOOSE Board Member —
ERIN BENN Board Member —
EILEEN FISHER Board Member —
JOY LOTT Board Member —
ANGELA DOWD Board Member —

Tax year 2021

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
SUSAN COUGHLIN EXECUTIVE DI 14.4% of Rev
GRAHAM BIER MUSIC DIRECT 12.5% of Rev
ROBERT LESNEFSKY Board President —
CATHY KREITZ-KIRN BOARD VICE C —
FRED OPALINSKI Secretary —
RUTH MOORE Treasurer —
DONALD EDINGER Board Member —
SHARON LUYBEN Board Member —
JASON BROCIOUS Board Member —
DAVID DUQUETTE Board Member —
JUDITHANNE LOOSE Board Member —
ERIN BENN Board Member —
EILEEN FISHER Board Member —
DANIEL IMMEL Board Member —
JOY LOTT Board Member —
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
55 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
45 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
30 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
45 / 100
Developing

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 462 other orgs in PA with NTEE prefix A6.

Most-divergent component: governance score sits 18 points below the peer median (45 vs. 63).

5-year trend: Steady State

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

The two changes that would most improve this score:

  1. Separate signing authority from fundraising authority when both are held by one person — removes the concentration penalty (~12 points).
  2. Stabilize program expenses or grow earned-income revenue to break the consecutive-deficit pattern (~8 points to financial score).

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.