Acute Resource Divergence
Acute Resource Divergence
Acute Resource Divergence Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Stable
Trajectory Thumbprint

Acute Resource Divergence

What does this mean?

Revenue is contracting significantly, but executive compensation percentage is rising. The organization is refusing to adjust its administrative overhead to match its new economic reality.

The Path Forward

The Realignment

Forces immediate balancing of administrative bloat against actual programmatic output. It demands that every dollar extracted for overhead be justified by community impact.

The Realignment
The Realignment
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Acute Resource Divergence
Overall
85
Score
Governance
85
Score
Financial
80
Score
Program
Score

Institutional Epochs

2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Resource Divergence

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2024 Hidden Hidden Unknown
2023 28.4% 36 Critical Intervention Needed Gov Risk
2022 28.7% 36 Critical Intervention Needed Gov Risk
2021 17.6% 49 Fragile Recovery
2020 29.2% 28 Critical Intervention Needed Gov Risk
2019 33.0% 36 Critical Intervention Needed Gov Risk
2018 18.7% 45 Fragile Gov Risk
2017 16.1% 45 Fragile Gov Risk
2016 21.2% 41 Governance-Stressed Gov Risk
2015 19.7% 41 Fragile Recovery
2014 16.9% 37 Fragile Stable Watch
2013 16.4% 37 Fragile Decline Risk
2012 10.9% 42 Fragile Recovery
2011 17.7% 27 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2025

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
DAVID ISKOWITZ Board Member 30.6% of Rev
HELGA WESTERHOFF FOUNDER

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
DAVID ISKOWITZ Board Member 23.4% of Rev
DAVID ISKOWITZ Board Member 23.3% of Rev
DAVID ISKOWITZ Board Member 23.0% of Rev
HELGA WESTERHOFF FOUNDER
HELGA WESTERHOFF FOUNDER
HELGA WESTERHOFF FOUNDER

Tax year 2021

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
DAVID ISKOWITZ Board Member 23.4% of Rev
HELGA WESTERHOFF FOUNDER
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
80 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
85 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
0 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
85 / 100
Stable

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 12,541 other orgs in US with NTEE prefix B2.

Most-divergent component: governance score sits 0 points above the peer median (85 vs. 85).

5-year trend: Acute Resource Divergence

Revenue is contracting significantly, but executive compensation percentage is rising. The organization is refusing to adjust its administrative overhead to match its new economic reality.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

No specific high-impact levers identified — this org's score is balanced across components.

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.