Institutional Maturation
Institutional Maturation
Institutional Maturation Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Developing
Trajectory Thumbprint

Institutional Maturation

What does this mean?

The gold standard. 10-year slow, steady, concurrent growth across Financial Health, Governance, and Program. Leadership is scaling their oversight and impact in lockstep.

The Path Forward

The Crown

A mandate to lead the sector. It encourages the organization to mentor emerging nonprofits and embark on generational capital projects, leveraging their profound stability.

The Crown
The Crown
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Institutional Maturation
Overall
49
Score
Governance
58
Score
Financial
35
Score
Program
60
Score

Institutional Epochs

2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Institutional Maturation

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2024 Hidden Hidden Unknown
2023 Hidden Hidden 4.0% 49 Fragile Decline Risk
2022 3.7% 49 Fragile Decline Risk
2021 0.7% 53 Fragile Recovery
2020 6.8% 44 Fragile Decline Risk
2019 2.8% 49 Fragile Decline Risk
2018 0.4% 53 Fragile Recovery
2017 2.7% 35 Financially Distressed Decline Risk
2016 1.1% 35 Financially Distressed Decline Risk
2015 4.0% 35 Financially Distressed Decline Risk
2014 4.6% 35 Financially Distressed Stable Watch
2013 4.2% 35 Financially Distressed Recovery
2012 29 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2011 31 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch
2010 33 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2025

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
PHILLIP VAN EMBDEN CHAIRMAN
ROBERT CONNER VICE CHAIRMA
JIM COOK JR Treasurer
LOIS ANN WEINER Secretary
BLAISE MENZONI Board Member
LARRY DEPALMA Board Member
LAUREN VAN EMBDEN Board Member
MELODY JONES Board Member
AMI SCHMITZ Board Member
JOHN TISA Board Member
CARLOS ANDUJAR JR Board Member
RICHARD CURCIO Board Member

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
AMANDA DEANGELIS Board Member 3.9% of Rev
PHILLIP VAN EMBDEN CHAIRMAN
ROBERT CONNER VICE CHAIRMAN
KEVIN REED Treasurer
LOIS ANN WEINER Secretary
BLAISE MENZONI Board Member
LARRY DEPALMA Board Member
JOHN SORANTINO Board Member
JIM COOK JR Board Member
LAUREN VAN EMBDEN Board Member
CARLOS ANDUJAR JR Board Member
MELODY JONES Board Member
DENA ANDREWS Board Member
JOHN TISA Board Member
RICHARD CURCIO Board Member

Tax year 2022

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
AMANDA DEANGELIS Board Member 0.7% of Rev
PHILLIP VAN EMBDEN CHAIRMAN
ROBERT CONNER VICE CHAIRMAN
KEVIN REED Treasurer
LOIS ANN WEINER Secretary
BLAISE MENZONI Board Member
LARRY DEPALMA Board Member
JOHN SORANTINO Board Member
JIM COOK JR Board Member
LAUREN VAN EMBDEN Board Member
CARLOS ANDUJAR JR Board Member
MELODY JONES Board Member
DENA ANDREWS Board Member
JOHN TISA Board Member
RICHARD CURCIO Board Member

Tax year 2021

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
AMANDA DEANGELIS Board Member 1.8% of Rev
PHILLIP VAN EMBDEN CHAIRMAN
ROBERT CONNER VICE CHAIRMAN
KEVIN REED Treasurer
LOIS ANN WEINER Secretary
BLAISE MENZONI Board Member
LARRY DEPALMA Board Member
MATTHEW ROBINSON Board Member
JOHN SORANTINO Board Member
JIM COOK JR Board Member
LAUREN VAN EMBDEN Board Member
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
35 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
58 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
60 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
49 / 100
Developing

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 4 other orgs in NJ with NTEE prefix A9.

Most-divergent component: program score sits 54 points above the peer median (60 vs. 6).

5-year trend: Institutional Maturation

The gold standard. 10-year slow, steady, concurrent growth across Financial Health, Governance, and Program. Leadership is scaling their oversight and impact in lockstep.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

The two changes that would most improve this score:

  1. Build cash reserves to at least 3 months of operating expenses — moves financial resilience score meaningfully (~10 points).

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.