Steady State
Steady State
Steady State Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Stable
Trajectory Thumbprint

Steady State

What does this mean?

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

The Path Forward

The Stewardship

Focuses on long-term sustainability and gentle cultivation of existing resources rather than forced expansion. It honors the organization's established role as a reliable anchor.

The Stewardship
The Stewardship
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Steady State
Overall
48
Score
Governance
50
Score
Financial
40
Score
Program
60
Score

Institutional Epochs

2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Steady State

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2023 48 Fragile Recovery
2022 Hidden Hidden 44 Financially Distressed Decline Risk
2021 52 Fragile Stable Watch
2020 52 Fragile Recovery
2019 45 Fragile Recovery
2018 38 Fragile Recovery
2017 29 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch
2016 29 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch
2015 29 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch
2014 8.9% 30 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch
2013 8.5% 30 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch
2012 7.4% 30 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch
2011 5.6% 30 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch
2010 8.5% 30 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2022

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
KAREN SCHADER Board President
DAVID PASCUCCI Treasurer
CAROL SELTZER Secretary
RHONDA STEEG Board Member
CHARLES JOHNSON Board Member
ROBERT BOULRICE Board Member
ALAINA MACAULAY Board Member
NNAMDI POLE Board Member
EMILY WOJCIK Board Member

Tax year 2021

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
KAREN SCHADER Board President
DAVID PASCCUCI Treasurer
WHITING HOUSTON Secretary
SHELLEY HOLZMAN Board Member
ROBERT BOULRICE Board Member
RHONDA STEEG Board Member
CHARLES JOHNSON Board Member
CAROL SELTZER Board Member
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
40 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
50 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
60 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
48 / 100
Stable

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 54 other orgs in MA with NTEE prefix A2.

Most-divergent component: program score sits 31 points above the peer median (60 vs. 29).

5-year trend: Steady State

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

Overall score has gone from 45 → 48 over 5 years (improving by 3 points).

What's driving this score

What would change this score

No specific high-impact levers identified — this org's score is balanced across components.

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.