Steady State
Steady State
Steady State Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Priority Review
Trajectory Thumbprint

Steady State

What does this mean?

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

The Path Forward

The Stewardship

Focuses on long-term sustainability and gentle cultivation of existing resources rather than forced expansion. It honors the organization's established role as a reliable anchor.

The Stewardship
The Stewardship
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Steady State
Overall
43
Score
Governance
50
Score
Financial
45
Score
Program
30
Score

Institutional Epochs

2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Steady State

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2025 Hidden Hidden Unknown
2024 12.1% 43 Financially Distressed Decline Risk
2023 51 Fragile Stable Watch
2022 15.0% 51 Fragile Recovery
2021 35 Financially Distressed Decline Risk
2020 49 Fragile Recovery
2019 37 Financially Distressed Decline Risk
2018 51 Fragile Recovery
2017 49 Fragile Recovery
2016 37 Financially Distressed Decline Risk
2015 39 Financially Distressed Decline Risk
2014 43 Financially Distressed Decline Risk
2013 45 Financially Distressed Decline Risk
2012 47 Financially Distressed Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2025

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Carolyn Newman Board Member 12.1% of Rev
Charles David Pedri Board President
Ashley Newman Board President
Thomas Newman Treasurer

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Carolyn Newman Board Member 12.1% of Rev
Charles David Pedri Board President
Ashley Newman Board President
Thomas Newman Treasurer
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
45 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
50 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
30 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
43 / 100
Priority Review

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 175 other orgs in NJ with NTEE prefix A6.

Most-divergent component: financial score sits 11 points above the peer median (45 vs. 34).

5-year trend: Steady State

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

No specific high-impact levers identified — this org's score is balanced across components.

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.