Structural Deficit
Structural Deficit
Structural Deficit Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Priority Review
Trajectory Thumbprint

Structural Deficit

What does this mean?

Persistently low financial health over 5 years despite strong programmatic output. They are borrowing from their future (or bleeding an endowment) to pay for today's programs.

The Path Forward

The Truth-Teller

Forces necessary, painful cuts to preserve the core. It demands that the organization stop borrowing from its future and align its current programmatic output with actual sustainable revenue.

The Truth-Teller
The Truth-Teller
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Structural Deficit ↑
Overall
34
Score
Governance
55
Score
Financial
0
Score
Program
60
Score

Institutional Epochs

2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Structural Deficit

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2025 Hidden Hidden — — Unknown —
2024 Hidden Hidden 7.4% 34 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2023 — — 5.2% 36 Financially Distressed Decline Risk
2022 — — 4.3% 41 Fragile Recovery
2021 — — 14.3% 35 Critical Intervention Needed Recovery
2020 — — 23.0% 27 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2019 — — 15.6% 33 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch
2018 — — 13.9% 35 Critical Intervention Needed Recovery
2017 — — 9.3% 32 Critical Intervention Needed Recovery
2016 — — 16.1% 31 Critical Intervention Needed Recovery
2015 — — 13.1% 31 Critical Intervention Needed Recovery
2014 — — 13.5% 29 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2013 — — 11.4% 36 Financially Distressed Stable Watch
2012 — — 11.6% 33 Critical Intervention Needed Recovery
2011 — — 23.1% 27 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2025

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
ANDREW CHIANG EXECUTIVE DI 7.4% of Rev
REGINA ANDRIOLO Board President —
JEN GONG VICE PRESIDE —
MARGARET BROWN Secretary —
MARISA PIERSON Treasurer —
VICTOR DAVSON Board Member —
EILEEN KOSKI Board Member —

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
ANDREW CHIANG EXECUTIVE DI 8.9% of Rev
ANDREW CHIANG EXECUTIVE DI 5.0% of Rev
THERESA SHUBECK Board President —
RONALD CHEN VICE PRESIDE —
EILEEN KOSKI Secretary —
MARISA PIERSON Treasurer —
PATRICIA MAYER Board Member —
VICTOR DAVSON Board Member —
ROBERT SAGE Board Member —
REGINA ANDRIOLO Board Member —
THERESA SHUBECK Board President —
RONALD CHEN VICE PRESIDE —
EILEEN KOSKI Secretary —
MARISA PIERSON Treasurer —
PATRICIA MAYER Board Member —
VICTOR DAVSON Board Member —
ROBERT SAGE Board Member —
REGINA ANDRIOLO Board Member —

Tax year 2021

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
ANDREW CHIANG EXECUTIVE DI 6.6% of Rev
NAI-NI CHEN Artistic Director 6.5% of Rev
NAI-NI CHEN Artistic Director 6.2% of Rev
ANDREW CHIANG EXECUTIVE DI 4.0% of Rev
REGINA ANDRIOLO Board President —
RONALD CHEN VICE PRESIDE —
EILEEN KOSKI Secretary —
ROBERT SAGE Treasurer —
PATRICIA MAYER Board Member —
VICTOR DAVSON Board Member —
THERESA SHUBECK Board President —
RONALD CHEN VICE PRESIDE —
EILEEN KOSKI Secretary —
MARISA PIERSON Treasurer —
PATRICIA MAYER Board Member —
VICTOR DAVSON Board Member —
ROBERT SAGE Board Member —
REGINA ANDRIOLO Board Member —
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
0 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
55 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
60 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
34 / 100
Priority Review

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 249 other orgs in NJ with NTEE prefix A6.

Most-divergent component: financial score sits 48 points below the peer median (0 vs. 48).

5-year trend: Structural Deficit

Persistently low financial health over 5 years despite strong programmatic output. They are borrowing from their future (or bleeding an endowment) to pay for today's programs.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

The two changes that would most improve this score:

  1. Build cash reserves to at least 3 months of operating expenses — moves financial resilience score meaningfully (~10 points).

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.