Steady State
Steady State
Steady State Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Developing
Trajectory Thumbprint

Steady State

What does this mean?

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

The Path Forward

The Stewardship

Focuses on long-term sustainability and gentle cultivation of existing resources rather than forced expansion. It honors the organization's established role as a reliable anchor.

The Stewardship
The Stewardship
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Steady State
Overall
47
Score
Governance
45
Score
Financial
50
Score
Program
45
Score

Institutional Epochs

2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Steady State

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2023 17.9% 47 Fragile Recovery
2022 24.0% 39 Fragile Gov Risk
2021 Hidden Hidden 17.3% 47 Fragile Decline Risk
2020 31.1% 48 Governance-Stressed Gov Risk
2019 57 Fragile Decline Risk
2018 61 Stable Stable Watch
2017 57 Fragile Decline Risk
2016 61 Stable Stable Watch
2015 61 Stable Stable Watch
2014 41 Fragile Stable Watch
2013 41 Fragile Decline Risk
2012 45 Fragile Decline Risk
2011 61 Stable Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
BRIAN SHELDON EXECUTIVE DI 17.9% of Rev
BARBARA NEU-BERTI Board President
RALPH TIMBER VICE PRESIDE
NANCY PERRY Treasurer
SHIRLEY NEISS Secretary
NANCY DUNN Board Member
CHET OPALKA Board Member
JOHN ROY Board Member
SHEILA MAHAN Board Member
MAUREEN STRAIGHT Board Member
SUE POWERS Board Member
MARY ELLEN TRUMBULL Board Member

Tax year 2021

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
BRIAN SHELDON EXECUTIVE DI 14.2% of Rev
JOHN ROY VICE PRESIDE
PATRICIA DOUGLAS Treasurer
SHIRLEY NEISS Secretary
NANCY DUNN Board Member
CHET OPALKA Board Member
VERONICA GABOURY Board Member
MEG PARASCANDOLA Board Member
JENNIFER PYLE Board Member
ROBERT PASQUARELLI Board Member
BARBARA NEU-BERTI Board President
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
50 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
45 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
45 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
47 / 100
Developing

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 700 other orgs in NY with NTEE prefix A6.

Most-divergent component: financial score sits 19 points above the peer median (50 vs. 31).

5-year trend: Steady State

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

Overall score has gone from 57 → 47 over 5 years (declining by 10 points). A multi-year directional move of this magnitude is a signal worth investigating.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

The two changes that would most improve this score:

  1. Separate signing authority from fundraising authority when both are held by one person — removes the concentration penalty (~12 points).

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.