Structural Deficit
Structural Deficit
Structural Deficit Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Priority Review
Trajectory Thumbprint

Structural Deficit

What does this mean?

Persistently low financial health over 5 years despite strong programmatic output. They are borrowing from their future (or bleeding an endowment) to pay for today's programs.

The Path Forward

The Truth-Teller

Forces necessary, painful cuts to preserve the core. It demands that the organization stop borrowing from its future and align its current programmatic output with actual sustainable revenue.

The Truth-Teller
The Truth-Teller
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Structural Deficit
Overall
37
Score
Governance
50
Score
Financial
5
Score
Program
60
Score

Institutional Epochs

2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Structural Deficit

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2025 Hidden Hidden Unknown
2024 Hidden Hidden Unknown
2023 Hidden Hidden 37 Financially Distressed Recovery
2022 37 Financially Distressed Decline Risk
2021 44 Fragile Recovery
2020 51.1% 26 Critical Intervention Needed Gov Risk
2019 8.8% 40 Fragile Recovery
2018 13.1% 25 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2017 13.2% 31 Critical Intervention Needed Recovery
2016 16.3% 28 Critical Intervention Needed Recovery
2015 14.8% 27 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2014 12.7% 31 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2013 9.2% 31 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2012 12.9% 35 Fragile Decline Risk
2011 12.8% 41 Fragile Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2026

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Christopher Handley Executive Director
Jessica Marinelli Board President
Michelle Bouton Board President
Axel H Heimer III Secretary
Nakiea Cook Treasurer
Karen King Board Member
Katie Pogorzelski Board Member
Linda Szal Sutton Board Member
Lee Ann Vogt Board Member

Tax year 2025

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Christopher Handley Executive Director
Jessica Marinelli Board President
Michelle Bouton Board President
Nakiea Cook Treasurer
Alyssa Brouillet Board Member
Alex H Heimer III Board Member
Karen King Board Member
David Sambora Board Member
Linda Szal Sutton Board Member
Lee Ann Vogt Board Member

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
MARIA PENDOLINO Board President
MICHELLE BOUTON Board President
NAKIEA COOK Treasurer
KEAVIN LEARY Board Member
SHAZAD MOHAMMED Board Member
ARMAND PETRI Board Member
DAVID SAMBORA Board Member
LEE ANN VOGT Board Member

Tax year 2022

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
KIM PIAZZA Board President
MARIA PENDOLINO Secretary
DAVID SAMBORA Treasurer
MICHELLE BOUTON Board Member
NAKIEA COOK Board Member
LEONARD G LONDON Board Member
SHAZAD MUSTAPHA MOHAMMED Board Member
ARMAND PETRI Board Member
LEE ANN VOGT Board Member

Tax year 2021

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
KIM PIAZZA Board President
DENNIS KNIPFING Board President
ELIZABETH BARSI Secretary
DAVID SAMBORA Treasurer
MICHELLE BOUTON Board Member
LEONARD G LONDON Board Member
SHAZAD MUSTAPHA MOHAMMED Board Member
MARIA PENDOLINO Board Member
ARMAND PETRI Board Member
DAVID SIPOS Board Member
LEE ANN VOGT Board Member
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
5 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
50 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
60 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
37 / 100
Priority Review

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 700 other orgs in NY with NTEE prefix A6.

Most-divergent component: program score sits 31 points above the peer median (60 vs. 29).

5-year trend: Structural Deficit

Persistently low financial health over 5 years despite strong programmatic output. They are borrowing from their future (or bleeding an endowment) to pay for today's programs.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

The two changes that would most improve this score:

  1. Build cash reserves to at least 3 months of operating expenses — moves financial resilience score meaningfully (~10 points).

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.